Gender and cooperative preferences on five continents

Furtner, Nadja C.; Kocher, Martin G.; Martinsson, Peter; Matzat, Dominik und Wollbrant, Conny (2016): Gender and cooperative preferences on five continents. Münchener Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Beiträge (VWL) 2016-19

Abstract

Evidence of gender differences in cooperation in social dilemmas is inconclusive. This paper experimentally elicits unconditional contributions, a contribution vector (cooperative preferences), and beliefs about the level of others’ contributions in variants of the public goods game. We show that existing inconclusive results can be understood and completely explained when controlling for beliefs and underlying cooperative preferences. Robustness checks based on data from around 450 additional independent observations around the world confirm our main empirical results: Women are significantly more often classified as conditionally cooperative than men, while men are more likely to be free riders. Beliefs play an important role in shaping unconditional contributions, and they seem to be more malleable or sensitive to subtle cues for women than for men.

• Dokumententyp: Paper
• Keywords: Public goods, conditional cooperation, gender, experiment
• Fakultät: Volkswirtschaft ; Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics ; Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics > Verhaltenswissenschaftliche Ökonomik
• Themengebiete: 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft
• JEL Classification: C91, D64, H41
• Sprache: Englisch

Literaturliste

Andreoni, J., Petrie, R. (2008), Beauty, gender and stereotypes: Evidence from laboratory experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology 29: 73-93.

Andreoni, J., Vesterlund, L. (2001), Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116: 293-312.

Arbak, E., Villeval, M.C. (2013), Voluntary leadership: Selection and influence. Social Choice and Welfare 40: 635-662.

Brown-Kruse, J., Hummels, D. (1993), Gender effects in laboratory public goods contribution: Do individuals put their money where their mouth is? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 22: 255-267.

Cadsby, C., Maynes, E. (1998), Gender and free riding in a threshold public goods game: Experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 34: 603-620.

Charness, G., Rustichini, A. (2011), Gender differences in cooperation with group membership. Games and Economic Behavior 72: 77-85.

Chermak, J. M., Krause, K. (2002), Individual response, information, and intergenerational common pool problems. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 43: 47-70.

Croson, R., Gneezy, U. (2009), Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature 47: 448-474.

DellaVigna, S., List, J., Malmendier, U., Rao, G. (2013), The importance of being marginal: Gender differences in generosity. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings 103: 586-590.

Dufwenberg, M., Gächter, S., Henning-Schmidt, H. (2011), The framing of games and the psychology of play. Games and Economic Behavior 73: 459-478.

Eckel, C. C., Grossman, P. J. (2008), Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. In: Plott, C., Smith, V. (Eds.). Handbook of Experimental Economics Results Vol. 1, New York: 509-519.

Fischbacher, U. (2007), z-Tree – Zurich toolbox for readymade economic experiments – experimenter’s manual. Experimental Economics 10: 171-178.

Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S. (2010), Social preferences, beliefs, and the dynamics of free riding in public goods experiments. American Economic Review 100: 541-556.

Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., Fehr, E. (2001), Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economic Letters 71: 397-404.

Fischbacher, U., Gächter, S., Quercia, S. (2012), The behavioral validity of the strategy method in public good experiments. Journal of Economic Psychology 33: 897-913.

Frank, R. H., Gilovich, T., Regan, D. T. (1993), Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? Journal of Economic Perspectives 7: 159-171.

Gächter, S., Nosenzo, D., Renner, E., Sefton, M. (2012), Who makes a good leader? Cooperativeness, optimism, and leading-by-example. Economic Inquiry 50: 953-967.

Gächter, S., Renner, E. (2010), The effects of (incentivized) belief elicitation in public good experiments. Experimental Economics 13: 364-377.

Greiner, B. (2015), Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE, Journal of the Economic Science Association 1, 114-125.

Herrmann, B., Thöni, C. (2009), Measuring conditional cooperation: a replication study in Russia. Experimental Economics 12: 87-92.

Kocher, M. G., Cherry, T., Kroll, S., Netzer, R., Sutter, M. (2008), Conditional cooperation on three continents. Economics Letters 101: 175-178.

Kocher, M. G., Martinsson, P., Matzat, D., Wollbrant, C. (2015), The role of beliefs, trust, and risk in contributions to a public good. Journal of Economic Psychology 51:236-244.

Kocher, M. G., Martinsson, P., Myrseth, K., Wollbrant, C. (2016), Strong, bold, and kind: Self-control and cooperation in social dilemmas. Experimental Economics, forthcoming.

Martinsson, P., Pham-Khanh, N., Villegas-Palacio, C. (2013), Conditional cooperation and disclosure in developing countries, Journal of Economic Psychology 34, 148-155.

Martinsson, P., Villegas-Palacio, C., Wollbrant, C. (2009), Conditional cooperation and social group: Experimental results from Colombia. Working Papers in Economics 372, University of Gothenburg.

Martinsson, P., Villegas-Palacio, C., Wollbrant, C. (2015), Cooperation and social classes: Evidence from Colombia. Social Choice and Welfare 45: 829-848.

Martinsson, P., Medhin, H., Vieider, F.M. (2016), Cooperative preferences in teams. Working Paper, University of Gothenburg.

Mason, C. F., Phillips, O. R., Redington, D. B. (1991), The role of gender in a non-cooperative game. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 15: 215-235.

Nowell, C., Tinkler, S. (1994), The influence of gender on the provision of a public good. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 25: 25-36.

Ortmann, A., Tichy, L. K. (1999), Gender differences in the laboratory: Evidence from prisoner’s dilemma games. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 39: 327-339.

Seguino, S., Stevens, T., Lutz, M. (1996), Gender and cooperative behavior: Economic man rides alone. Feminist Economics 2: 1-21.

Sell, J., Wilson, R. K. (1991), Levels of information and contributions to public goods. Social Forces 70: 107-124.

Sell, J., Griffith, W., Wilson, R. K. (1993), Are women more cooperative than men in social dilemmas? Social Psychology Quarterly 56: 211-222.

Solow, J. L., Kirkwood, N. (2002), Group identity and gender in public goods experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 48: 403-412.

Stockard, J., van de Kragt, A. J. C., Dodge, P. J. (1988), Gender roles and behavior in social dilemmas: Are there sex differences in cooperation and in its justification? Social Psychology Quarterly 51: 154.

Volk, S., Thöni, C., Rugirok, W. (2012), Temporal stability and psychological foundations of cooperation preferences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 81: 664-676.