Abstract
The analysis of voter transitions is an important area of electoral studies. A main strategy is to use aggregate data provided by the offices of statistics regarding districts, precincts, communities etc. and to rely on ecological inference. Ecological inference, however, is plagued by the well-known indeterminacy problem. In this article, we present the so far most extensive systematic empirical comparison of commonly used approaches for ecological inference of the analysis of voter transitions. Our evaluation is based on diverse simulations for multiple assumptions and scenarios. Based on recent election data for the German metropolitan city Munich, we are able to show that an application of the hierarchical multinomial-Dirichlet model, which is implemented in the R-library eiPack, exhibits the best overall estimation performance. Other prominent approaches frequently used by practitioners, e.g. the Thomsen logit approach, proved to be inconsistent. Furthermore, we demonstrate that appropriate data preprocessing is crucial for achieving reliable results.
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Keywords: | Ecological inference; Voter transitions; Hierarchical Bayesian models |
Faculties: | Social Sciences > Geschwister-Scholl-Institute for Political Science Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics > Statistics Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics > Statistics > Chairs/Working Groups > StabLab |
Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 310 Statistics 300 Social sciences > 320 Political science 500 Science > 510 Mathematics |
ISSN: | 1863-8171; 1863-818X |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 31616 |
Date Deposited: | 19. Dec 2016, 14:05 |
Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020, 13:08 |