Abstract
The “iteration argument” presented in Schlicht (1996) shows that the allocation of property rights may generate inefficiencies, contrary to what the “Coase Theorem,” as commonly understood, asserts. The argument may be summarized by saying that markets (and bargaining) cease to function properly if several people are entitled and prepared to engage in the same externality-ridden activity and each of them has to be bribed individually from being the first offender. Given that the harm from pollution does not rise linearily with the amount of pollution, the sum-total of the damages produced when all of the potential offenders engage in the harmful activity may be smaller than the sum-total of the bribes which must be offered to prevent each potential offender from starting the offensive activity, even if the ensuing social damages exceed the associated private returns and an inefficient outcome is obtained. If pollution without permission by the community is not permitted, a different – and in this case efficient – outcome results.
This note illustrates the argument by means of a simple example. It is an excerpt of Schlicht (1997).
Dokumententyp: | Paper |
---|---|
Publikationsform: | Postprint |
Keywords: | claims, contract enforcement, contracts, entitlements, interactions, motivation, norms, obligations, rights |
Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics
Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics > Mikroökonomik Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics > Institutionenökonomik Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics > Ökonomie des Rechts Volkswirtschaft > Lehrstühle > Seminar für Theorie und Politik der Einkommensverteilung (aufgelöst) |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
JEL Classification: | D02, D04, D23, D62, H23, K11, O50 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-31703-4 |
ISBN: | 0-19-829224-4 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 31703 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 09. Jan. 2017, 08:18 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 08. Dez. 2020, 14:53 |
Literaturliste: | Bütter, Michael and Hands-Bernd Schäfer 1997, "Exploiting the Coase Mechanism: The Extortion Problem, a Note on Ekkehart Schlicht", Kyklos 50, 4 (1997), pp. 575-79. Coase, Ronald H. 1993, "The Nature of the Firm: Influence", in Williamson, Oliver and Winter, Sidney, ed., The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development (Oxford University Press, 1993). Farrell, Joseph 1987, "Information and the Coase Theorem", Journal of Economic Perspectives 1, 2 (1987), pp. 113-29. Frey, Bruno 1997, Not Just for the Money (Edward Elgar Publishing, 1997). Illing, Gerhard 1992, "Private Information as Transaction Costs: The Coase Theorem Revisited", Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) 148, 4 (1992), pp. 558-576. Schlicht, Ekkehart 1996, "Exploiting the Coase Mechanism: The Extortion Problem", Kyklos 49, 3 (1996), pp. 319-30. Schlicht, Ekkehart 1997, "The Coase Mechanism and the Iteration Argument: Reply", Kyklos 50, 4 (1997), pp. 581-85. Schweizer, Urs 1988, "Externalities and the Coase Theorem: Hypothesis or Result?", Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) / Zeitschrift für die gesamte Staatswissenschaft 144, 2 (1988), pp. 245-266. Titmuss, R. M. 1970, The Gift Relationship - From Human Blood to Social Policy. Allen and Unwin. 1970. (Allen & Unwin, 1970). Williamson, O. E. 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York: Free Press, 1985). |