Quantitative Easing in the Euro Area

Urbschat, Florian and Watzka, Sebastian (May 2017): Quantitative Easing in the Euro Area. An Event Study Approach. Discussion Papers in Economics 2017-10

Abstract

We examine the effects of the Asset Purchase Programme (APP) gradually introduced by the European Central Bank from September 2014 onwards. Studying the short-term reaction of financial markets after APP press releases, we analyse the development of bond yields and spreads around these releases. More precisely, we try to estimate different asset price channels by quantifying the cumulative decrease of spreads and by running event regressions for several Euro Area countries. Focusing on the signalling channel, measured by the OIS rate, and the portfolio rebalancing channel, proxied by the conditional bond-OIS spread, we find that the effects in yield and spread reduction were most pronounced for the initial announcement on the Public Sector Purchase Programme (PSPP) but declined afterwards for additional announcements. Possible explanations for this are the declining degree to which the ECB surprised markets and the increasingly burdensome institutional set-up of the APP. While yield reductions were larger for periphery countries' than for core countries' bonds, our evidence suggests that this stronger reduction is mostly due to a decreasing risk component of southern bonds. In fact, once controlling for this implicit credit risk reduction we find rather mild effects from portfolio rebalancing for all countries.

• Item Type: Paper
• Keywords: Large Scale Asset Purchase, Yield curve, Quantitative Easing, APP, Event study
• Faculties: Economics; Economics > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics
• Subjects: 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics
• JEL Classification: E43, E44, E52, E58, G14
• Language: English

References

Altavilla, C., Carboni, G., and Motto, R. (2015): “Asset purchase programmes and financial markets: lessons from the euro area”. ECB Working Paper Series (1864).

Boeckx, J. et al. (2014): “Effectiveness and transmission of the ECB’s balance sheet policies”. CESifo Working Paper Series (4907).

Chen, H., Curdia, V., and Ferrero, A. (2012): “The macroeconomic effects of large scale asset purchase programmes”. Economic Journal 122(September 2011), F289–F315.

Chodorow-Reich, G. (2014): “Effects of unconventional monetary policy on financial institutions”. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Spring), pp. 155–228.

Christensen, J. H. E. and Krogstrup, S. (2014): “Swiss unconventional monetary policy: Lessons for the transmission of quantitative easing”. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper Series (2014-18).

Claeys, G., Leandro, A., and Mandra, A. (2015): “European Central Bank quantitative easing: The detailed manual”. Bruegel Policy Contribution (02), pp. 1–18.

Cúrdia, V. and Woodford, M. (2011): “The central-bank balance sheet as an instrument of monetarypolicy”. Journal of Monetary Economics 58(1), pp. 54–79.

D’Amico, S. and King, T. B. (2013): “Flow and stock effects of large-scale treasury purchases: Evidence on the importance of local supply”. Journal of Financial Economics 108(2), pp. 425–448.

ECB (2014): “Euro Area risk-free interest rates: Measurement issues, recent developments and relevance to monetary policy”. ECB Monthly Bulletin (July), pp. 79–98.

Eser, F. and Schwaab, B. (2016): “Evaluating the impact of unconventional monetary policy measures: Empirical evidence from the ECBs Securities Markets Programme”. Journal of Financial Economics 119(1), pp. 147–167.

Fratzscher, M., Lo Duca, M., and Straub, R. (2014): “ECB unconventional monetary policy actions: Market impact, international spillovers and transmission channels”. In: International Monetary Fund.

Gagnon, J. et al. (2011): “The financial market effects of the federal reserve’s large-scale asset purchases”. International Journal of Central Banking 7(1), pp. 3–43.

Gambacorta, L., Hofmann, B., and Peersman, G. (2014): “The effectiveness of unconventional monetary policy at the zero lower bound: A cross country analysis”. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 46(4), pp. 615–642.

Joyce, M. A. S., Lasaosa, A., et al. (2011): “The financial market impact of quantitative easing in the United Kingdom”. International Journal of Central Banking 7(3), pp. 113–161. 27

Joyce, M. A. S. and Tong, M. (2012): “QE and the gilt market: A disaggregated analysis”. Economic Journal 122(564), pp. 348–384.

Kapetanios, G. et al. (2012): “Assessing the economy wide effects of quantitative easing”. Economic Journal 122(564), pp. 316–347.

Krishnamurthy, A. and Vissing-Jorgensen, A. (2011): “The effects of quantitative easing on interest rates: Channels and implications for policy”. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2011(2), pp. 215–287.

Lewis, V. et al. (2015): “The financial market effects of the ECB’s balance sheet policies”. KU Leuven - Discussion Paper Series (15.20).

Neely, C. J. (2015): “Unconventional monetary policy had large international effects”. Journal of Banking and Finance 52, pp. 101–111.

Pesaran, M. H. and Smith, R. (1995): “Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels”. Journal of econometrics 68(1), pp. 79–113.

Schenkelberg, H. and Watzka, S. (2013): “Real effects of quantitative easing at the zero lower bound: Structural VAR-based evidence from Japan”. Journal of International Money and Finance 33, pp. 327–357.

Szczerbowicz, U. (2015): “The ECB unconventional monetary policies: Have they lowered market borrowing costs for banks and governments?” International Journal of Central Banking 11(4), pp. 91–127.

Tobin, J. (1969): “A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory”. Journal of money, credit and banking 1(1), pp. 15–29.

Ugai, H. (2006): “Effects of the quantitative easing policy: A survey of empirical analyses”. Bank of Japan Working Paper Series (March), p. 63.

Vayanos, D. and Vila, J.-L. (2009): “A preferred-habitat model of the term structure of interest rates”. NBER Working Paper (No. 15487).

Wallace, N. (1981): “A Modigliani-Miller theorem for open-market operations”. American Economic Review 71(3), pp. 267–274.