Abstract
Although the determination of the linear depolarization ratio with lidar seems to be a simple task at first sight, systematic errors can skew the results a great deal. Different unknown systematic errors in different instruments make it difficult to compare the results and to compile a consistent picture of the aerosol properties from measurements around the globe. For the correction of known systematic errors and for the estimation of the uncertainty of the correction we first need a model of the lidars with a mathematical description of the measurements which contribute to the determination of the linear depolarization ratio. This lecture will introduce the model that has recently been published for this purpose [1]. An important part deals with the relative calibration of the signal channels which contribute to the linear depolarization ratio. A basic understanding of the Mueller-Stokes formalism [2,3] will facilitate to follow the lecture.
| Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Lecture) |
|---|---|
| EU Funded Grant Agreement Number: | 262254 |
| EU Projects: | 7. Framework Programme (FP7) |
| Keywords: | polarization lidar, depolarization ratio, systematic error, error correction, error calculation |
| Faculties: | Physics |
| Subjects: | 500 Science > 530 Physics 500 Science > 550 Earth sciences and geology |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-39105-1 |
| Language: | English |
| Item ID: | 39105 |
| Date Deposited: | 12. Jun 2017 13:49 |
| Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020 13:16 |
| References: | 1. Freudenthaler, V., About the effects of polarising optics on lidar signals and the Δ90-calibration, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 2016, 9, 4181-4255, doi:10.5194/amt-9-4181-2016 2. Hauge, P., Muller, R. and Smith, C., Conventions and formulas for using the Mueller-Stokes calculus in ellipsometry, Fourth International Conference on Ellipsometry, Berkeley, CA, August 20-22, 1979, Retrieved from: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/13t0c9d0, 2012 3. Chipman, R. A., in Bass, M. (Eds.) Handbook of Optics, Volume I (3rd Edition), Chap. 14, Mueller matrices, McGraw-Hill, 2009 |

