Eva, Benjamin and Hartmann, Stephan
(21. November 2017):
When No Reason For Is A Reason Against.
[PDF, 178kB]
Preview

External fulltext: http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/14132/
Abstract
We provide a Bayesian justification of the idea that, under certain conditions, the absence of an argument in favour of the truth of a hypothesis H constitutes a good argument against the truth of H.
Item Type: | Paper |
---|---|
Form of publication: | Preprint |
Keywords: | Bayesian Epistemology, Argumentation |
Faculties: | Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Science > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP) Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Science > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP) > Epistemology |
Subjects: | 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 100 Philosophy |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-41931-0 |
Annotation: | Published in: Analysis, Volume 78, Issue 3, July 2018, Pages 426–431, https://doi-org.emedien.ub.uni-muenchen.de/10.1093/analys/anx160 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 41931 |
Date Deposited: | 09. Jan 2018, 11:59 |
Last Modified: | 01. Sep 2023, 11:21 |