Logo Logo
Switch Language to German

Colombo, Matteo; Elkin, Lee and Hartmann, Stephan (15. December 2016): Bayesian Cognitive Science, Monopoly, and Neglected Frameworks. [PDF, 269kB]

[thumbnail of BayesCogSci_final.pdf]
Draft Version
Download (269kB)


A widely shared view in the cognitive sciences is that discovering and assessing explanations of cognitive phenomena whose production involves uncertainty should be done in a Bayesian framework. One assumption supporting this modelling choice is that Bayes provides the best approach for representing uncertainty. However, it is unclear that Bayes possesses special epistemic virtues over alternative modelling frameworks, since a systematic comparison has yet to be attempted. Currently, it is then premature to assert that cognitive phenomena involving uncertainty are best explained within the Bayesian framework. As a forewarning, progress in cognitive science may be hindered if too many scientists continue to focus their efforts on Bayesian modelling, which risks to monopolize scientific resources that may be better allocated to alternative approaches.

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item