Abstract
Authoritarian regimes have surpassed democracies in foreign reserve accumulation since the Asian Financial Crisis. Two prominent institutionalist theories could explain this diverging trend in reserves: First, the political business cycle theory, suggesting that reserves are reduced before an election. Second, the veto player theory, implying that a high number of veto players increases the de facto independence of central bankers, who are reluctant to invest in reserves. A time-series cross-sectional analysis for up to 182 countries over the period 1990-2013 shows that democratic governments tend to reduce their reserves before elections. While veto players do not affect reserves directly, a high number of veto players tends to limit a political business cycle before an election. Elections and veto players do not have an influence in authoritarian regimes. Election cycles tend to explain why democracies have relatively fallen behind in a period of massive reserve accumulation. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
| Item Type: | Journal article |
|---|---|
| Faculties: | Economics |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
| ISSN: | 0176-2680 |
| Language: | English |
| Item ID: | 43487 |
| Date Deposited: | 27. Apr 2018 08:04 |
| Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020 13:18 |
