Logo Logo
Hilfe
Hilfe
Switch Language to English

Janni, W.; Harbeck, N.; Rack, B.; Augustin, D.; Jückstock, J.; Wischnik, A.; Annecke, K.; Scholz, C.; Huober, J.; Zwingers, T.; Friedl, T. W. P. und Kiechle, M. (2016): Randomised phase III trial of FEC120 vs EC-docetaxel in patients with high-risk node-positive primary breast cancer: final survival analysis of the ADEBAR study. In: British Journal of Cancer, Bd. 114, Nr. 8: S. 863-871

Volltext auf 'Open Access LMU' nicht verfügbar.

Abstract

Background: Taxane-containing adjuvant chemotherapy has been established as standard treatment in node-positive breast cancer. This study compared efficacy and tolerability of epirubicin (E)/cyclophosphamide (C) followed by docetaxel (Doc) with a dose-dense 5-fluorouracil (F) + E + C regimen. Methods: The ADEBAR study was a randomised phase III trial for women with primary invasive breast cancer and >= 4 metastatic axillary lymph nodes (n = 1364). Treatment consisted of four 21-day cycles of E plus C, followed by four 21-day cycles of Doc (EC-Doc), or six 28-day cycles of E plus F plus C (FEC120). Results: Disease-free survival (DFS) was similar in the two treatment arms as shown by multivariate Cox regression adjusted for other prognostic factors (EC-Doc vs FEC120, hazard ratio (HR): 1.087;95% confidence interval (CI): 0.878-1.346, P = 0.444). In addition, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the two groups (HR: 0.974;95% CI: 0.750-1.264, P = 0.841). Haematologic toxicity was more common in FEC120 recipients;non-haematologic toxicities occurred more frequently in the EC-Doc arm. The serious adverse event rate was significantly higher in the FEC120 group (29.7% vs 22.5%). Conclusions: EC-Doc provides a feasible and effective alternative therapy option to FEC120 with a different safety profile in this high-risk breast cancer cohort.

Dokument bearbeiten Dokument bearbeiten