Logo Logo
Help
Contact
Switch Language to German

Leitgeb, Hannes (April 2005): What Truth Depends on. In: Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 34, No. 2: pp. 155-192

Full text not available from 'Open Access LMU'.

Abstract

What kinds of sentences with truth predicate may be inserted plausibly and consistently into the T-scheme? We state an answer in terms of dependence: those sentences which depend directly or indirectly on non-semantic states of affairs (only). In order to make this precise we introduce a theory of dependence according to which a sentence φ is said to depend on a set Φ of sentences iff the truth value of φ supervenes on the presence or absence of the sentences of Φ in/from the extension of the truth predicate. Both φ and the members of Φ are allowed to contain the truth predicate. On that basis we are able define notions such as ungroundedness or self-referentiality within a classical semantics, and we can show that there is an adequate definition of truth for the class of sentences which depend on non-semantic states of affairs.

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item