Abstract
Aristotle's most fundamental distinction between changes and other activities is not that of Metaphysics 0.6, between end-exclusive and end-inclusive activities, but one implicit in Physics 3.1s definition of change, between the activity of something incomplete and the activity of something complete. Notably, only the latter distinction can account for Aristotle's view, in Physics 3.3, that 'agency' effecting change in something, e.g. teaching does not qualify strictly as a change. This distinction in firms De Anima 2.5 and imparts unity to Aristotle's extended treatment of change in Physics 3.1-3.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 100 Philosophie |
ISSN: | 0031-8868 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 55555 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 14. Jun. 2018, 09:59 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020, 13:35 |