Abstract
We argue that the modification proposed by Li et al. [Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 (2015) 050303] to the experiment of Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 240402] does not test the past of the photon as characterized by local weak traces. Instead of answering the questions: (i) were the photons in A? (ii) were the photons in.. ? and (iii) were the photons in C? the proposed experiment measures a degenerate operator answering the questions: (i) were the photons in A? and (ii) were the photons in B and C together? A negative answer to the last question does not tell us if photons were present in B or C On the other hand, a simple variation of the proposal by Li et al. does provide conceptually better evidence for the past of the pre-and post-selected photon, but this evidence will be in agreement with the results of Danan et al.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Physik |
Themengebiete: | 500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 530 Physik |
ISSN: | 0256-307X |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 55717 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 14. Jun. 2018, 10:00 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020, 13:35 |