Abstract
We argue that the modification proposed by Li et al. [Chin. Phys. Lett. 32 (2015) 050303] to the experiment of Danan et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013) 240402] does not test the past of the photon as characterized by local weak traces. Instead of answering the questions: (i) were the photons in A? (ii) were the photons in.. ? and (iii) were the photons in C? the proposed experiment measures a degenerate operator answering the questions: (i) were the photons in A? and (ii) were the photons in B and C together? A negative answer to the last question does not tell us if photons were present in B or C On the other hand, a simple variation of the proposal by Li et al. does provide conceptually better evidence for the past of the pre-and post-selected photon, but this evidence will be in agreement with the results of Danan et al.
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Faculties: | Physics |
Subjects: | 500 Science > 530 Physics |
ISSN: | 0256-307X |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 55717 |
Date Deposited: | 14. Jun 2018, 10:00 |
Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020, 13:35 |