
Abstract
There is a huge variation in the size of labor supply elasticities in the literature, which hampers policy analysis. While recent studies show that preference heterogeneity across countries explains little of this variation, we focus on two other important features: observation period and estimation method. We start with a thorough survey of existing evidence for both Western Europe and the USA, over a long period and from different empirical approaches. Then, our meta-analysis attempts to disentangle the role of time changes and estimation methods. We highlight the key role of time changes, documenting the incredible fall in labor supply elasticities since the 1980s not only for the USA but also in the EU. In contrast, we find no compelling evidence that the choice of estimation method explains variation in elasticity estimates. From our analysis, we derive important guidelines for policy simulations.
Item Type: | Journal article |
---|---|
Keywords: | Household labor supply; Elasticity; Taxation; Europe; USA |
Faculties: | Economics > Chairs > CESifo-Professorship for Public Finance |
Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-60021-6 |
ISSN: | 2193-8997 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 60021 |
Date Deposited: | 23. Jan 2019, 17:44 |
Last Modified: | 04. Nov 2020, 13:38 |