Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Pulmonary function tests are used for screening respiratory insufficiency in patients with myotonic dystrophy (DM). We analysed the agreement between two different approaches in assessment of abnormal findings of forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), in DM patients. METHODS We used Cohen's \textgreekk- and Bangdiwala's B- statistic to compare the agreement between different cut-off values recommended by experts (ENMC) and the cut-off values based on the reference range (RR). We further analysed their sensitivity (Sn) and specificity (Sp) in detecting symptoms associated with respiratory insufficiency. RESULTS The observed agreement was: 1) for FVC: \textgreekk= -0.002, B = 0.406; 2) for FEV1: \textgreekk= 0.944, B = 0.946; 3) for MIP: \textgreekk= 0.625, B = 0.674; and 4) for MEP: \textgreekk= 0.241, B = 0.373. Overall, RR cut-off values showed higher sensitivity, whereas the ENMC values showed higher specificity in detecting symptoms of respiratory involvement. CONCLUSIONS The two approaches showed perfect agreement in assessment of FEV1, substantial agreement for MIP, and weak agreement for FVC and MEP. RR is an established method of assessment for spirometry and should be favoured because it takes variability within the population into account. Further development and validation of regression equations for RR calculations of predicted maximal respiratory pressures, with corresponding lower limits of normal, is required.The B statistic is more robust in assessing agreement between two diagnostic methods, resolving the issue of the \textgreekk paradox.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Medizin > Institut für Medizinische Informationsverarbeitung, Biometrie und Epidemiologie |
Themengebiete: | 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin und Gesundheit |
ISSN: | 2214-3599 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 61825 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 09. Mai 2019, 07:04 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020, 13:39 |