Logo Logo
Help
Contact
Switch Language to German

Siedlecki, Jakob; Luft, Nikolaus; Mayer, Wolfgang J.; Siedlecki, Martin; Kook, Daniel; Meyer, Bertram; Bechmann, Martin; Wiltfang, Rainer; Priglinger, Seigfried G. and Dirisamer, Martin (2018): CIRCLE Enhancement After Myopic SMILE. In: Journal of Refractive Surgery, Vol. 34, No. 5: pp. 304-309

Full text not available from 'Open Access LMU'.

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of enhancement after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using the VisuMax CIRCLE option (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany), which converts the SMILE cap into a femtosecond LASIK flap for secondary excimer laser application. METHODS: Of 2.065 SMILE procedures, 22 eyes (1.1%) re-treated with CIRCLE with a follow-up of 3 months were included in the analysis. SMILE was performed in the usual manner. For re-treatment, the CIRCLE procedure was performed with pattern D flap creation on the VisuMax system and subsequent excimer laser ablation with a Zeiss MEL 90 laser (Carl Zeiss Meditec) with piano target in all cases. RESULTS: Spherical equivalent was -5.56 +/- 2.22 diopters (D) before SMILE and -0.51 +/- 1.08 D before CIRCLE, CIRCLE enhancement was performed after a mean of 10.0 +/- 7.9 months, allowed for safe flap lifting in all eyes, and resulted in a final manifest refraction spherical equivalent of 0.18 +/- 0.31 D at 3 months (P < .008), The number of eyes within 0.50 and 1.00 D from target refraction increased from 31.8% to 90.9% and from 77.3% to 100%, respectively. Mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) had already improved from 0.37 <= 0.16 to 0.08 <= 0.18 logMAR at 1 week (P < .0001), resulting in 0.03 <= 0.07 logMAR at 3 months (P < .0001), All eyes gained at least one line of UDVA. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) remained unchanged at all time points (before vs after CIRCLE, P = .40), Two eyes (9.1 %) lost one line of CDVA;no eye lost two or more lines. The safety and efficacy indices were 1.03 and 0.97 at 3 months, CONCLUSIONS: The CIRCLE procedure represents an effective re-treatment option after SMILE, Compared to surface ablation re-treatment after SMILE, CIRCLE seems to offer advantages in respect to speed of visual recovery, safety, and predictability, but at the price of flap creation.

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item