Abstract
In the area of algebraic specification there are two main approaches for defining observational abstraction: behavioural specifications use a notion of observational satisfaction for the axioms of a specification, whereas abstractor specifications define an abstraction from the standard semantics of a specification w.r.t. an observational equivalence relation between algebras. Earlier work by Bidoit, Hennicker, Wirsing has shown that in the case of first-order logic specifications both concepts coincide semantically under mild assumptions. Analogous results have been shown by Sannella and Hofmann for higher-order logic specifications and recently, by Hennicker and Madeira, for specifications of reactive systems using a dynamic logic with binders. In this paper, we bring these results into a common setting: we isolate a small set of characteristic principles to express the behaviour/abstractor equivalence and show that all three mentioned specification frameworks satisfy these principles and therefore their behaviour and abstractor specifications coincide semantically (under mild assumptions). As a new case we consider observational modal logic where observational satisfaction of Hennessy-Milner logic formulae is defined "up to" silent transitions and observational abstraction is defined by weak bisimulation. We show that in this case the behaviour/abstractor equivalence can only be obtained, if we restrict models to weakly deterministic labelled transition systems.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Mathematik, Informatik und Statistik > Informatik |
Themengebiete: | 000 Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke > 004 Informatik |
ISSN: | 0304-3975 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 66480 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 19. Jul. 2019, 12:19 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 13. Aug. 2024, 12:58 |