Abstract
In this paper, I investigate in how far we can use fictional stories to learn about logic. How can we engage with fiction in order to come to find out what logical principles are actually valid? Is that possible at all? I claim that it is, and I propose two case studies to make the point.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Publikationsform: | Publisher's Version |
Fakultät: | Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft > Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy (MCMP) > Logic |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 100 Philosophie
100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 160 Logik |
ISSN: | 1448-5052 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 69256 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 23. Okt. 2019, 11:30 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 23. Okt. 2019, 14:10 |
Literaturliste: | Achourioti, T., Fugard, A. J., and Stenning, K. (2014). The empirical study of norms is just what we are missing. Frontiers in psychology, 5. Badura, C., Berto, F. (2019). Truth in fiction, impossible worlds, and belief revision. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 97(1), 178-193. Berto, F., Jago, M. (2019). Impossible worlds. Oxford University Press. Crossley, J., and Dummett, M. (eds.) (1965). Formal Systems and Recursive Functions, Amsterdam, North-Holland Publishing. Dummett, M. (1978). Truth and other enigmas. Harvard University Press. Estrada González, L. (2018). (In Some Fictions) Everything is True. The Australasian Journal of Logic, 15(2), 64-76. Hanley, R. (2004). As Good As It Gets: Lewis on Truth in Fiction. In Jackson and Priest (eds.), Lewisian Themes, Oxford, Oxford University Press. Kapsner, A. (2014). Logics and Falsifications. Springer. Kripke, S. (1965). Semantical analysis of intuitionistic logic. In J. Crossley and M. A. E. Dummett (eds.) (1965): 92–130. Lewis, D. (1982). ’Logic for Equivocators’, Noûs, Vol. 16, No. 3., pp. 431-441. Lewis, D. (1978). Truth in Fiction. American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1): 37-46. Nelson, D. (1949). Constructible falsity. Journal of Symbolic logic, 14/1:16–26. Priest, G., Beall, J., and Armour-Garb, B. (eds.) (2004). The Law of Non-Contradiction: New Philosophical Essays, Oxford University Press. Priest, G. (1999). Sylvan’s Box: A Short Story and Ten Morals. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 38(4): 573-582, 1999 Priest, G. (2006). In Contradiction, Second Edition, Oxford University Press. Priest, G. (2008). Introduction to Non-Classical Logic, 2nd edition, Cambridge University Press. Proudfoot, D. (2018). Sylvan’s Bottle and other Problems. The Australasian Journal of Logic, 15(2), 5-123. Routley, R. (1979). The semantical structure of fictional discourse. Poetics, 8(1-2), 3-30. Routley, R. (1980). Exploring Meinong's Jungle and Beyond: An Investigation of Noneism and the Theory of Items (Interim edition). Departmental Monograph No. 3, Philosophy Department, Research School of Social Sciences, Australian National University. Varzi, A. C. (1997). Inconsistency without contradiction. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 38(4), 621-639. Wansing, H. (1993). The logic of information structures. Lecture notes in AI 681, Berlin, Springer. Wansing, H. (1998). Displaying modal logic. Dordrecht, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Weatherson, B. (2004). Morality, Fiction, and Possibility. Philosopher’s Imprint vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1-27, 2004. Wildman, N., Folde, C. (2017). Fiction unlimited. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism75(1): 73-80. Williamson, T. (1994a). Never say never. Topoi, 13(2), 135–145. Williamson, T. (1994b). Vagueness. Routledge. Woods, J. (2009). The Logic of fiction. College Publications. |