Abstract
The second-order election (SOE) model as originally formulated by Reif and Schmitt (1980) suggests that, relative to the preceding first-order election result, turnout is lower in SOEs, government and big parties lose, and small and ideologically extreme parties win. These regularities are not static but dynamic and related to the first-order electoral cycle. These predictions of the SOE model have often been tested using aggregate data. The fact that they are based on individual-level hypotheses has received less attention. The main aim of this article is to restate the micro-level hypotheses for the SOE model and run a rigorous test for the 2004 and 2014 European elections. Using data from the European Election Studies voter surveys, our analysis reveals signs of sincere, but also strategic abstentions in European Parliament elections. Both strategic and sincere motivations are also leading to SOE defection. It all happens at once.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Keywords: | electoral cycle; second-order elections; sincere voting; strategic voting; turnout; vote switching |
Fakultät: | Sozialwissenschaften > Geschwister-Scholl-Institut für Politikwissenschaft |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 320 Politik |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-70561-0 |
ISSN: | 2183-2463 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 70561 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 13. Feb. 2020, 12:56 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020, 13:52 |