Logo Logo
Help
Contact
Switch Language to German
Vangala, Deepak; Ladigan, Swetlana; Liffers, Sven-Thorsten; Noseir, Soha; Maghnouj, Abdelouahid; Götze, Tina-Maria; Verdoodt, Berlinda; Klein-Scory, Susanne; Godfrey, Laura; Zowada, Martina K.; Huerta, Mario; Edelstein, Daniel L.; Villarreal, Jaime Martinez de; Marqués, Miriam; Kumbrink, Jörg; Jung, Andreas; Schiergens, Tobias S.; Werner, Jens; Heinemann, Volker; Stintzing, Sebastian; Lindoerfer, Doris ORCID: 0000-0003-3078-0856; Mansmann, Ulrich; Pohl, Michael; Teschendorf, Christian; Bernhardt, Christiane; Wolters, Heiner; Stern, Josef; Usta, Selami; Viebahn, Richard; Admard, Jacob; Casadei, Nicolas; Fröhling, Stefan; Ball, Claudia R.; Siveke, Jens T.; Glimm, Hanno; Tannapfel, Andrea; Schmiegel, Wolff; Hahn, Stephan A. (2021): Secondary resistance to anti-EGFR therapy by transcriptional reprogramming in patient-derived colorectal cancer models. In: Genome Medicine, Vol. 13, No. 116
[img]
Preview
Creative Commons Attribution 4MB

Abstract

BACKGROUND The development of secondary resistance (SR) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (anti-EGFR) antibodies is not fully understood at the molecular level. Here we tested in vivo selection of anti-EGFR SR tumors in CRC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models as a strategy for a molecular dissection of SR mechanisms. METHODS We analyzed 21 KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PI3K wildtype CRC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models for their anti-EGFR sensitivity. Furthermore, 31 anti-EGFR SR tumors were generated via chronic in vivo treatment with cetuximab. A multi-omics approach was employed to address molecular primary and secondary resistance mechanisms. Gene set enrichment analyses were used to uncover SR pathways. Targeted therapy of SR PDX models was applied to validate selected SR pathways. RESULTS In vivo anti-EGFR SR could be established with high efficiency. Chronic anti-EGFR treatment of CRC PDX tumors induced parallel evolution of multiple resistant lesions with independent molecular SR mechanisms. Mutations in driver genes explained SR development in a subgroup of CRC PDX models, only. Transcriptional reprogramming inducing anti-EGFR SR was discovered as a common mechanism in CRC PDX models frequently leading to RAS signaling pathway activation. We identified cAMP and STAT3 signaling activation, as well as paracrine and autocrine signaling via growth factors as novel anti-EGFR secondary resistance mechanisms. Secondary resistant xenograft tumors could successfully be treated by addressing identified transcriptional changes by tailored targeted therapies. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates that SR PDX tumors provide a unique platform to study molecular SR mechanisms and allow testing of multiple treatments for efficient targeting of SR mechanisms, not possible in the patient. Importantly, it suggests that the development of anti-EGFR tolerant cells via transcriptional reprogramming as a cause of anti-EGFR SR in CRC is likely more prevalent than previously anticipated. It emphasizes the need for analyses of SR tumor tissues at a multi-omics level for a comprehensive molecular understanding of anti-EGFR SR in CRC.