Abstract
Despite the truthful dominant strategy, participants in strategy-proof mechanisms submit manipulated preferences. In our model, participants dislike rejections and enjoy the confirmation from getting what they declared most desirable. Formally, the payoff from a match decreases in its position in the submitted ranking such that a strategic trade-off between preference intensity and match probability arises. This trade-o↵ can trigger the commonly observed self-selection strategies. We show that misrepresentations can persist for arbitrarily small report-dependent components. However, honesty is guaranteed to be optimal if and only if there is no conflict between the quality and feasibility of a match
| Item Type: | Paper |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | Market design, matching, school choice, self-regarding preferences, strategy-proof mechanisms |
| Faculties: | Economics Economics > Collaborative Research Center Transregio "Rationality and Competition" |
| Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
| JEL Classification: | D47, D78, D81, D91 |
| URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-77855-9 |
| Language: | English |
| Item ID: | 77855 |
| Date Deposited: | 16. Nov 2021 13:01 |
| Last Modified: | 16. Nov 2021 13:01 |

