Abstract
Laboratory evidence shows that when people have to argue for a given position, they persuade themselves about the position’s factual and moral superiority. Such self-persuasion limits the potential of communication to resolve conflict and reduce polarization. We test for this phenomenon in a field setting, at international debating competitions that randomly assign experienced and motivated debaters to argue one side of a topical motion. We find self-persuasion in factual beliefs and confidence in one’s position. Effect sizes are smaller than in the laboratory, but robust to a one-hour exchange of arguments and a ten-fold increase in incentives for accuracy.
Dokumententyp: | Paper |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft
Volkswirtschaft > Collaborative Research Center Transregio "Rationality and Competition" |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
JEL Classification: | C93, D72, D83, D91 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-78044-1 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 78044 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 01. Dez. 2021, 12:18 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 01. Dez. 2021, 12:18 |