Diabetes and outcomes following guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pre-specified analysis from the randomised TROPICAL-ACS trial

Hein, Ralph; Gross, Lisa; Aradi, Daniel; Rieber, Johannes; Hadamitzky, Martin; Merkely, Bela; Huczek, Zenon; Ince, Hueseyin; Hummel, Astrid; Baylacher, Monika; Massberg, Steffen; Trenk, Dietmar und Sibbing, Dirk (2019): Diabetes and outcomes following guided de-escalation of antiplatelet treatment in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pre-specified analysis from the randomised TROPICAL-ACS trial. In: Eurointervention, Bd. 15, Nr. 6

Abstract

Aims: A guided de-escalation of P2Y12 inhibitor treatment is considered an alternative treatment strategy in ACS patients undergoing PCI. However, the safety and efficacy of this strategy may differ in diabetic vs non-diabetic patients. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of platelet function testing (PFT)-guided de-escalation of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in ACS patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Methods and results: The TROPICAL-ACS trial randomised 2,610 biomarker-positive ACS patients 1:1 to either standard treatment with prasugrel for 12 months (control group) or PFT-guided DAPT de-escalation. The association and interaction of diabetes on clinical endpoints across treatment groups and on platelet reactivity was investigated. In diabetic patients (n=527, 20.2%), the overall event rates were high and the one-year incidence of the primary endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke or bleeding >= grade 2) did not differ between guided de-escalation and control group patients (12.5% vs 10.8%;HR 1.17, 95% CI: 0.71-1.93, p=0.55). In non-diabetic patients (n=2,083, 79.8%), the one-year incidence of the primary endpoint was lower in the guided de-escalation vs control group (6.1% vs 8.5%;HR 0.71, 95% CI: 0.52-0.99, p=0.04, p(int)=0.10). Diabetic patients showed higher platelet reactivity levels in both control (=on prasugrel, p=0.01) and guided de-escalation group (=on clopidogrel, p=0.005) patients. Conclusions: Although diabetic status did not significantly interfere with the treatment effects of guided DAPT de-escalation, our results suggest that this approach might be safe and effective in non-diabetic patients. Further investigation is definitely warranted in diabetic patients.

• Dokumententyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
• Fakultät: Medizin
• Themengebiete: 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
• ISSN: 1774-024X
• Sprache: Englisch