Logo Logo
Hilfe
Hilfe
Switch Language to English

Schennach, Rebecca; Riedel, Michael; Spellmann, Ilja; Musil, Richard; Obermeier, Michael; Jaeger, Markus; Bottlender, Roland; Schmauss, Max; Laux, Gerd und Moeller, Hans-Jürgen (2019): Comparing Schizophrenia Patients With a Predicted High/Low Risk of Nonresponse Receiving Treatment with Ziprasidone and Haloperidol: A Randomized-Controlled Study. In: Pharmacopsychiatry, Bd. 52, Nr. 4: S. 180-185

Volltext auf 'Open Access LMU' nicht verfügbar.

Abstract

Introduction The aim of this double-blind randomized study was to evaluate the response to antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia patients with predicted high/low risk of nonresponse identified by applying a set of well-established scales and predictors of outcome and to compare efficacy between ziprasidone and haloperidol. Methods One hundred twelve schizophrenia patients (ziprasidone: n=54;haloperidol: n=58) were rated weekly on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale for Schizophrenia (PANSS), the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF), the Social and Occupational Functioning Scale (SOFAS), the Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS), and Hillside Akathisia Scale (HAS). Results Ninety-two patients (82%) were predicted to have a high risk of nonresponse. No significant difference regarding PANSS improvement in this subsample was found comparing ziprasidone and haloperidol (p=0.563). Also, for the total patient sample, no significant difference was found regarding the course of the PANSS total score, GAF (p=0.921), and SOFAS (p=0.658) between ziprasidone and haloperidol. Haloperidol resulted in higher scores on the SAS (p=0.001) and HAS (p=0.011). Discussion An alarmingly high number of patients were at high risk of nonresponse to antipsychotic treatment.

Dokument bearbeiten Dokument bearbeiten