Logo Logo
Hilfe
Hilfe
Switch Language to English

Unterrainer, Marcus; Fleischmann, D. F.; Diekmann, C.; Vomacka, L.; Lindner, S.; Vettermann, F.; Brendel, M.; Wenter, V.; Ertl-Wagner, B.; Herms, J.; Wetzel, C.; Rupprecht, R.; Tonn, J. C.; Belka, C.; Bartenstein, P.; Niyazi, M. und Albert, Nathalie L. ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0953-7624 (2019): Comparison of F-18-GE-180 and dynamic F-18-FET PET in high grade glioma: a double-tracer pilot study. In: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Bd. 46, Nr. 3: S. 580-590

Volltext auf 'Open Access LMU' nicht verfügbar.

Abstract

BackgroundPET represents a valuable tool for glioma imaging. In addition to amino acid tracers such as F-18-FET, PET targeting the 18-kDa mitochondrial translocator-protein (TSPO) is of high interest for high-grade glioma (HGG) imaging due to its upregulation in HGG cells. F-18-GE-180, a novel TSPO ligand, has shown a high target-to-background contrast in HGG. Therefore, we intra-individually compared its uptake characteristics to dynamic F-18-FET PET and contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with HGG.MethodsTwenty HGG patients (nine IDH-wildtype, 11 IDH-mutant) at initial diagnosis (n=8) or recurrence (n=12) were consecutively included and underwent F-18-GE-180 PET, dynamic F-18-FET PET, and MRI. The maximal tumour-to-background ratios (TBRmax) and biological tumour volumes (BTV) were evaluated in F-18-GE-180 and F-18-FET PET. Dynamic F-18-FET PET analysis included the evaluation of minimal time-to-peak (TTPmin). In MRI, the volume of contrast-enhancement was delineated (VOLCE). Volumes were spatially correlated using the SOrensen-Dice coefficient.ResultsThe median TBRmax tended to be higher in F-18-GE-180 PET compared to F-18-FET PET [4.58 (2.33-8.95) vs 3.89 (1.56-7.15);p=0.062] in the overall group. In subgroup analyses, IDH-wildtype gliomas showed a significantly higher median TBRmax in F-18-GE-180 PET compared to F-18-FET PET [5.45 (2.56-8.95) vs 4.06 (1.56-4.48);p=0.008];by contrast, no significant difference was observed in IDH-mutant gliomas [3.97 (2.33-6.81) vs 3.79 (2.01-7.15) p=1.000]. Only 5/20 cases showed higher TBRmax in F-18-FET PET compared to F-18-GE-180 PET, all of them being IDH-mutant gliomas. No parameter in F-18-GE-180 PET correlated with TTPmin (p>0.05 each). There was a tendency towards higher median BTVGE-180 [32.1 (0.4-236.0) ml] compared to BTVFET [19.3 (0.7-150.2) ml;p=0.062] with a moderate spatial overlap [median SOrensen-Dice coefficient 0.55 (0.07-0.85)]. In MRI, median VOLCE [9.7 (0.1-72.5) ml] was significantly smaller than both BTVFET and BTVGE180 (p<0.001 each), leading to a poor spatial correlation with BTVGE-180 [0.29 (0.01-0.48)] and BTVFET [0.38 (0.01-0.68)].ConclusionPET with F-18-GE-180 and F-18-FET provides differing imaging information in HGG dependent on the IDH-mutational status, with diverging spatial overlap and vast exceedance of contrast-enhancement in MRI. Combined PET imaging might reveal new insights regarding non-invasive characterization of tumour heterogeneity and might influence patients' management.

Dokument bearbeiten Dokument bearbeiten