Outcome of Liver Transplant Patients With High Urgent Priority: Are We Doing the Right Thing?

de Boer, Jacob D.; Braat, Andries E.; Putter, Hein; de Vries, Erwin; Strassburg, Christian H.; Mathe, Zoltan; van Hoek, Bart; Braun, Felix; van den Berg, Aad P.; Mikulic, Danko; Michielsen, Peter; Trotovsek, Blaz; Zoller, Heinz; de Boer, Jan; van Rosmalen, Marieke D.; Samuel, Undine; Berlakovich, Gabriela und Guba, Markus (2019): Outcome of Liver Transplant Patients With High Urgent Priority: Are We Doing the Right Thing? In: Transplantation, Bd. 103, Nr. 6: S. 1181-1190

Abstract

Background. About 15% of liver transplantations (LTs) in Eurotransplant are currently performed in patients with a high-urgency (HU) status. Patients who have acute liver failure (ALF) or require an acute retransplantation can apply for this status. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of this prioritization. Methods. Patients who were listed for LT with HU status from January 1, 2007, up to December 31, 2015, were included. Waiting list and posttransplantation outcomes were evaluated and compared with a reference group of patients with laboratory Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (labMELD) scores >= 40 (MELD 40+). Results. In the study period, 2299 HU patients were listed for LT. Ten days after listing, 72% of all HU patients were transplanted and 14% of patients deceased. Patients with HU status for primary ALF showed better patient survival at 3 years (69%) when compared with patients in the MELD 40+ group (57%). HU patients with labMELD >= 45 and patients with HU status for acute retransplantation and labMELD >= 35 have significantly inferior survival at 3-year follow-up of 46% and 42%, respectively. Conclusions. Current prioritization for patients with ALF is highly effective in preventing mortality on the waiting list. Although patients with HU status for ALF have good outcomes, survival is significantly inferior for patients with a high MELD score or for retransplantations. With the current scarcity of livers in mind, we should discuss whether potential recipients for a second or even third retransplantation should still receive absolute priority, with HU status, over other recipients with an expected, substantially better prognosis after transplantation.

• Dokumententyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
• Fakultät: Medizin
• Themengebiete: 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
• ISSN: 0041-1337
• Sprache: Englisch