Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that the take-the-best heuristic-flagship of "fast and frugal heuristics" research program-might in fact not be as frugal as tallying, which is considered to be a more complex strategy. Characterizing a simple decision strategy has always seemed straightforward, and the debate around the simplicity of the take-the-best heuristic is mostly concerned with a proper specification of the heuristic. I argue that the predominate conceptions of "simplicity" and "frugality" need to be revised. To this end, a number of recent behavioral and neuroscientific results are discussed. The example of take-the-best heuristic serves as an entry point to a foundational debate on bounded agency. I argue that the fast and frugal heuristics needs to question some of its legacy from the classical AI research. For example, the assumption that the bottleneck of decision-making process is information processing due to its serial nature. These commitments are hard to reconcile with the modern neuroscientific view of a human decision-maker. In addition, I discuss an overlooked source of uncertainty, namely neural noise, and compare a generic heuristic model to a similar neural algorithm.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft |
Fakultätsübergreifende Einrichtungen: | Graduate School of Systemic Neurosciences (GSN) |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 100 Philosophie
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik > 500 Naturwissenschaften |
ISSN: | 1059-7123 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 81751 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 15. Dez. 2021, 14:59 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 10. Mrz. 2023, 10:34 |