Abstract
Putnam construed the aim of Carnap's program of inductive logic as the specification of a universal learning machine, and presented a diagonal proof against the very possibility of such a thing. Yet the ideas of Solomonoff and Levin lead to a mathematical foundation of precisely those aspects of Carnap's program that Putnam took issue with, and in particular, resurrect the notion of a universal mechanical rule for induction. In this paper, I take up the question whether the Solomonoff-Levin proposal is successful in this respect. I expose the general strategy to evade Putnam's argument, leading to a broader discussion of the outer limits of mechanized induction. I argue that this strategy ultimately still succumbs to diagonalization, reinforcing Putnam's impossibility claim.
| Item Type: | Journal article |
|---|---|
| Faculties: | Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Science |
| Subjects: | 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 100 Philosophy |
| ISSN: | 0165-0106 |
| Language: | English |
| Item ID: | 81784 |
| Date Deposited: | 15. Dec 2021 14:59 |
| Last Modified: | 15. Dec 2021 14:59 |
