Abstract
Is compulsory licensing an effective antitrust remedy to increase innovation? To answer this question, we analyze the 1956 consent decree that settled an antitrust lawsuit against Bell, a vertically integrated monopolist charged with foreclosing the telecommunications equipment market. Bell was forced to license all its existing patents royalty-free, including those not related to telecommunications. We identify the effect of the consent decree on follow-on innovations building on Bell patents by using exactly matched non-Bell patents as control group. We show that the consent decree led to a lasting increase in innovation but only in markets outside the telecommunications sector.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
ISSN: | 1945-7731 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 84713 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 25. Jan. 2022, 09:11 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 25. Jan. 2022, 09:11 |