Logo Logo
Switch Language to German
Hoefner, K.; Hampel, C.; Kirschner-Hermanns, R.; Alloussi, S. H.; Bauer, R. M.; Bross, S.; Bschleipfer, T.; Goepel, M.; Haferkamp, A.; Huesch, T.; Kaufmann, A.; Kiss, G.; Kranz, J.; Oelke, M.; Pannek, J.; Reitz, A.; Rutkowski, M.; Schafer, W.; Schulte-Baukloh, H.; Schumacher, S.; Seif, C.; Schultz-Lampel, D. (2020): Einsatz von synthetischen Band- und Netzimplantaten bei der Behandlung von Belastungsinkontinenz und Descensus genitalis der Frau. Stellungnahme des Arbeitskreises Urologische Funktionsdiagnostik und Urologie der Frau der Akademie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie. In: Urologe, Vol. 59, No. 1: pp. 65-71
Full text not available from 'Open Access LMU'.


Due to a safety alert issued by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2011 for transvaginal mesh implants to treat female prolapse as a result of numerous reports of complications such as infection, chronic pain, dyspareunia, vaginal erosion, shrinkage and erosion into other organs nearly all industrial products have been withdrawn from the market in the meantime. The United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand extended warnings and prohibitions even on the implantation of midurethral slings (TVT, TOT). In view of these current international controversies regarding the use of implanted materials for the treatment of stress incontinence and prolapse and the lack of clear guidelines for the use of biomaterials, the opinion of the Working Group on Urological Functional Diagnostics and Female Urology should provide clarity. The Opinion is based on the SCENIHR Report of the "European Commission's Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks", the "Consensus Statement of the European Urology Association and the European Urogynaecological Association on the Use of Implanted Materials for Treating Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence" and in compliance with relevant EAU and national guidelines and the opinion of the Association for Urogynaecology and Plastic Pelvic Floor Reconstruction (AGUB eV). In addition, recommendations are given for the future handling of implants of slings and meshes for the treatment of stress incontinence and prolapse from a urologic viewpoint.