5-Year Outcomes After TAVR With Balloon -Expandable Versus Self -Expanding Valves

Abdel-Wahab, Mohamed; Landt, Martin; Neumann, Franz-Josef; Massberg, Steffen; Frerker, Christian; Kurz, Thomas; Kaur, Jatinderjit; Toelg, Ralph; Sachse, Susanne; Jochheim, David; Schaefer, Ulrich; El-Mawardy, Mohamed; Robinson, Derek R. und Richardt, Gert (2020): 5-Year Outcomes After TAVR With Balloon -Expandable Versus Self -Expanding Valves. In: Jacc-Cardiovascular Interventions, Bd. 13, Nr. 9: S. 1071-1082

Abstract

OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and echocardiographic outcome data of the CHOICE (Randomized Comparison of Transcatheter Heart Valves in High Risk Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis: Medtronic CoreValve Versus Edwards SAPIEN XT) trial at 5 years. Background: The CHOICE trial was designed to compare device performance of a balloon-expandable (BE) transcatheter heart valve (THV) versus a self-expanding (SE) THV. METHODS The CHOICE trial is an investigator-initiated trial that randomized 241 high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis and an anatomy suitable for treatment with both BE and SE THVs to transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement with either device. The primary endpoint was device success. Patients were followed up to 5 years, with assessment of clinical outcomes, and echocardiographic evaluation of valve function and THV durability. RESULTS After 5 years, there were no statistically significant differences between BE and SE valves in the cumulative incidence of death from any cause (53.4% vs. 47.6%;p = 0.38), death from cardiovascular causes (31.6% vs. 21.5%;p = 0.12), all strokes (17.5% vs. 16.5%;p = 0.73), and repeat hospitalization for heart failure (28.9% vs. 22.5%;p = 0.75). SE patients had larger prosthetic valve area (1.6 +/- 0.5 cm(2) vs. 1.9 +/- 0.5 cm(2);p = 0.02) with a lower mean transprosthetic gradient (12.2 +/- 8.7 mm Hg vs. 6.9 +/- 2.7 mm Hg;p = 0.001) at 5 years. No differences were observed in the rates of paravalvular regurgitation. Clinical valve thrombosis occurred in 7 BE patients (7.3%) and 1 SE patient (0.8%;p = 0.06), and moderate or severe structural valve deterioration in 6 BE patients (6.6%) and no SE patient (0%;p = 0.018). The rate of bioprosthetic valve failure was low and not significantly different between both groups (4.1% vs. 3.4%;p = 0.63). Conclusions: Five-year follow-up of patients in the CHOICE trial revealed clinical outcomes after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement with early-generation BE and SE valves that were not statistically significantly different, with limited statistical power. Forward flow hemodynamics were significantly better with the SE valve. Moderate or severe structural valve deterioration was uncommon but occurred more frequently with the BE valve. (A Comparison of Transcatheter Heart Valves in High Risk Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: The CHOICE Trial [CHOICE];NCT01645202) (c) 2020 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

• Dokumententyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
• Fakultät: Medizin
• Themengebiete: 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
• ISSN: 1936-8798
• Sprache: Englisch