Logo Logo
Hilfe
Hilfe
Switch Language to English

Schmid, Peter; Cortes, Javier; Pusztai, Lajos; McArthur, Heather; Kuemmel, Sherko; Bergh, Jonas; Denkert, Carsten; Park, Yeon Hee; Hui, Rina; Harbeck, Nadia; Takahashi, Masato; Foukakis, Theodoros; Fasching, Peter A.; Cardoso, Fatima; Untch, Michael; Jia, Liyi; Karantza, Vassiliki; Zhao, Jing; Aktan, Gursel; Dent, Rebecca und O'Shaughnessy, Joyce (2020): Pembrolizumab for Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. In: New England Journal of Medicine, Bd. 382, Nr. 9: S. 810-821

Volltext auf 'Open Access LMU' nicht verfügbar.

Abstract

Background: Previous trials showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile associated with pembrolizumab in patients with early triple-negative breast cancer. Whether the addition of pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy would significantly increase the percentage of patients with early triple-negative breast cancer who have a pathological complete response (defined as no invasive cancer in the breast and negative nodes) at definitive surgery is unclear. Methods In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) patients with previously untreated stage II or stage III triple-negative breast cancer to receive neoadjuvant therapy with four cycles of pembrolizumab (at a dose of 200 mg) every 3 weeks plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (784 patients;the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group) or placebo every 3 weeks plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (390 patients;the placebo-chemotherapy group);the two groups then received an additional four cycles of pembrolizumab or placebo, and both groups received doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide or epirubicin-cyclophosphamide. After definitive surgery, the patients received adjuvant pembrolizumab or placebo every 3 weeks for up to nine cycles. The primary end points were a pathological complete response at the time of definitive surgery and event-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Results At the first interim analysis, among the first 602 patients who underwent randomization, the percentage of patients with a pathological complete response was 64.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 59.9 to 69.5) in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 51.2% (95% CI, 44.1 to 58.3) in the placebo-chemotherapy group (estimated treatment difference, 13.6 percentage points;95% CI, 5.4 to 21.8;P<0.001). After a median follow-up of 15.5 months (range, 2.7 to 25.0), 58 of 784 patients (7.4%) in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 46 of 390 patients (11.8%) in the placebo-chemotherapy group had disease progression that precluded definitive surgery, had local or distant recurrence or a second primary tumor, or died from any cause (hazard ratio, 0.63;95% CI, 0.43 to 0.93). Across all treatment phases, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher was 78.0% in the pembrolizumab-chemotherapy group and 73.0% in the placebo-chemotherapy group, including death in 0.4% (3 patients) and 0.3% (1 patient), respectively. Conclusions: Among patients with early triple-negative breast cancer, the percentage with a pathological complete response was significantly higher among those who received pembrolizumab plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy than among those who received placebo plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy. (Funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme [a subsidiary of Merck];KEYNOTE-522 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03036488.).) The addition of pembrolizumab to platinum-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased the percentage of patients with a pathological complete response among patients with locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer. Side effects of the immunotherapy were added to the usual toxic effects of chemotherapy, but most patients completed planned treatment.

Dokument bearbeiten Dokument bearbeiten