Abstract
A series of attempts have been made to determine Kant's exact position towards theodicy, and to understand whether it is a direct consequence of his critical philosophy or, rather, whether it is merely linked to some inner development within his critical philosophy. However, I argue that the question of Kant's critical relation to theodicy has been misunderstood;and that in fact, Kant redefines the essence of the theodicean question anew. After introducing some major aspects of Kant`s new conception of theodicy, I show how understanding this conception is necessary for correctly analysing his specific arguments against theodicy. I demonstrate this point by examining Kant's second argument against theodicy, in which he tackles the Leibnizian problem of `metaphysical evil', and show why, in light of the above, interpretations thus far have failed to capture the essence of Kant's claim in this regard.
| Item Type: | Journal article |
|---|---|
| Faculties: | Philosophy, Philosophy of Science and Religious Science |
| Subjects: | 100 Philosophy and Psychology > 100 Philosophy |
| ISSN: | 0003-9101 |
| Language: | English |
| Item ID: | 88442 |
| Date Deposited: | 25. Jan 2022 09:27 |
| Last Modified: | 25. Jan 2022 09:27 |
