Abstract
Anchoring is a robust behavioral phenomenon modeled predominantly as a bias in individual judgment. We propose a game-theoretic model that considers players’ beliefs about others’ behavior as a mediator for the effect of the anchor on a player’s choice. The results establish that anchoring in strategic interactions reported in the literature can be rationalized by anchored beliefs about the opponents’ intentions. Notwithstanding, we also demonstrate that a player might adjust away from rather than toward the anchor in games where choices are strategic substitutes.
Item Type: | Paper |
---|---|
Keywords: | anchoring bias, auctions, games, incomplete information, strategy |
Faculties: | Economics > Collaborative Research Center Transregio "Rationality and Competition" |
Subjects: | 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics |
JEL Classification: | D01, D91, C72 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-90737-6 |
Language: | English |
Item ID: | 90737 |
Date Deposited: | 27. Jan 2022, 07:33 |
Last Modified: | 27. Jan 2022, 07:33 |