Abstract
Agents with reciprocal preferences prefer to be matched to a partner who also likes to collaborate with them. In this paper, we introduce and formalize reciprocal preferences, apply them to matching markets, and analyze the implications for mechanism design. Formally, the preferences of an agent can depend on the preferences of potential partners and there is incomplete information about the partners’ preferences. We find that there is no stable mechanism in standard two-sided markets. Observing the final allocation of the mechanism enables agents to learn about each other's preferences, leading to instability. However, in a school choice setting with one side of the market being non-strategic, modified versions of the deferred acceptance mechanism can achieve stability. These results provide insights into non-standard preferences in matching markets, and their implications for efficient information and mechanism design.
Dokumententyp: | Paper |
---|---|
Keywords: | market design; matching; reciprocal preferences; non-standard preferences; gale-shapley deferred acceptance mechanism; incomplete information |
Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft > Collaborative Research Center Transregio "Rationality and Competition" |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
JEL Classification: | C78, D47, D82, D83, D91 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-94762-5 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 94762 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 28. Feb. 2023, 12:08 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 28. Feb. 2023, 12:08 |