Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Arthroscopically Assisted Ankle Facture Treatment Versus Conventional Treatment

Baumbach, Sebastian F.; Urresti-Gundlach, Marcel; Braunstein, Mareen; Borgmann, Lars; Boecker, Wolfgang; Vosseller, J. Turner und Polzer, Hans (2021): Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Arthroscopically Assisted Ankle Facture Treatment Versus Conventional Treatment. In: Foot & Ankle International, Bd. 42, Nr. 4: S. 400-408

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the prospective, longitudinal outcome after arthroscopically assisted open reduction and internal fixation (AORIF) and to compare the results with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in complex ankle fractures. Methods: Acute, closed, bimalleolar equivalent, bimalleolar, or trimalleolar ankle fractures were included. The AORIF cohort was enrolled prospectively. The ORIF group was identified from a retrospective database. The same inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. The only difference was the additional arthroscopy in the AORIF cohort. The patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) following AORIF was assessed at 1 and 4 years of follow-up using the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS) and Tegner activity scale (TAS). The AORIF cohort was propensity score matched (nearest-neighbor matching) to the ORIF database. The OMAS and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) were compared between the resulting groups. Nonparametric statistics were applied;values are presented as median (interquartile range). Twenty-six AORIF patients had a prospective 4-year follow-up. Results: No significant differences (1 year vs 4 years) were identified for the OMAS (90 [10] vs 90 [11]) and TAS (4 [2] vs 5 [2]). The severity of the cartilage lesions (International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] grade <4 vs ICRS of 4) had no significant influence on the PROMs. Twenty-five patients per cohort (AORIF vs ORIF) were matched. The OMAS (90 [13] vs 75 [40];P = .008) and FAAM Activities of Daily Living (ADL;96 [11] vs 88 [30];P = .034) revealed significantly better outcomes for AORIF. More patients in the AORIF cohort returned to sport (96% vs 77%;P = .035), with a higher FAAM Sports score (88 [37] vs 56 [47];P = .008). Conclusion: AORIF for complex ankle fractures led to consistently good to excellent results. The propensity score-matched analysis revealed a significantly better outcome 4 years after surgery for AORIF compared with ORIF.

• Dokumententyp: Zeitschriftenartikel
• Fakultät: Medizin
• Themengebiete: 600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften > 610 Medizin und Gesundheit
• ISSN: 1071-1007
• Sprache: Englisch