Logo Logo
Hilfe
Hilfe
Switch Language to English

Graeser, Monika; Harbeck, Nadia; Gluz, Oleg; Wuerstlein, Rachel; Eulenburg, Christine zu; Schumacher, Claudia; Grischke, Eva -Maria; Forstbauer, Helmut; Dimpfl, Moritz; Braun, Michael; Christgen, Matthias; Kreipe, Hans Heinrich; Potenberg, Jochem; Schumann, Raquel von; Aktas, Bahriye; Kolberg-Liedtke, Cornelia; Kuemmel, Sherko und Nitz, Ulrike (2021): The use of breast ultrasound for prediction of pathologic complete response in different subtypes of early breast cancer within the WSG-ADAPT subtrials. In: Breast, Bd. 59: S. 58-66

Volltext auf 'Open Access LMU' nicht verfügbar.

Abstract

Objective: We assessed the value of breast ultrasound (US) performed at week 3 and 6 and at the end (EOT) of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) for prediction of pathologic complete response (pCR, ypT0/is ypN0) in patients with HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2-or HR-/HER2+ early breast cancer enrolled in the WSG-ADAPT subtrials. Methods: US was performed at week 3 and 6 of NAT and at EOT in 401, 517, and 553 patients, respec-tively. Tumors with complete or partial response by US (RECIST 1.1) were classified as responders and those with stable or progressive disease as non-responders. Results: pCR rate was higher in US responders than in non-responders. US tended to yield the highest positive predictive value in HR-/HER2+ (69%) and HR-/HER2-tumors (65%) at week 3, and the highest negative predictive value in HR+/HER2+ tumors at week 6 and at EOT (88.9% and 86.9%, respectively) and in HR-/HER2-tumors at EOT (87.9%). Multivariable analysis of patients with US at week 3 and 6 identified tumor subtype (HR-/HER2+ vs HR+/HER2+;odds ratio (OR) 2.77, 95%CI 1.45-5.29, and OR 4.17, 95%CI 2.26-7.68, respectively) and each 10% change in lesion dimension on US from baseline (OR 1.15, 95%CI 1.08-1.24, and OR 1.25, 95%CI 1.16-1.35, respectively) as parameters associated with pCR. Conclusions: Our data support the use of week 3 and EOT US for prediction of pCR in response-guided NAT and in planning of breast-conserving surgery. Change in tumor diameter on US as a continuous variable could be a valuable alternative to categorical RECIST 1.1 criteria. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Dokument bearbeiten Dokument bearbeiten