Logo Logo
Hilfe
Hilfe
Switch Language to English

Haas, M.; Waldschmidt, D. T.; Stahl, M.; Reinacher-Schick, A.; Freiberg-Richter, J.; Fischer von Weikersthal, L.; Kaiser, F.; Kanzler, S.; Frickhofen, N.; Seufferlein, T.; Dechow, T.; Mahlberg, R.; Malfertheiner, P.; Illerhaus, G.; Kubicka, S.; Abdul-Ahad, A.; Snijder, R.; Kruger, S.; Westphalen, C. B.; Held, S.; Bergwelt-Baildon, M. von; Boeck, S. und Heinemann, V. (2021): Afatinib plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone as first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer: The randomised, open-label phase II ACCEPT study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie with an integrated analysis of the 'burden of therapy' method. In: European Journal of Cancer, Bd. 146: S. 95-106

Volltext auf 'Open Access LMU' nicht verfügbar.

Abstract

Background: Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor pathway remains controversial in pancreatic cancer. Afatinib is an oral irreversible ErbB family blocker approved in non-small-cell lung cancer. This open-label, multicenter, randomised phase II trial evaluated gemcitabine plus afatinib (Gem/afatinib) versus gemcitabine (Gem) alone as first-line treatment for metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients and methods: Patients were randomised in a 2:1 ratio to either Gem (1000 mg/m(2) weekly for three weeks followed by one week of rest, repeated every four weeks) and afatinib (40 mg orally once daily) or Gem alone. Overall survival (OS) was the primary study endpoint. The novel BOTh(C)(TM) methodology was implemented to derive a quantitative estimate for the 'Burden of Therapy/Toxicity' (BOTh) for each patient on every day during the clinical study. Conclusion: The addition of afatinib to Gem did not improve treatment efficacy and was more toxic. The BOTh(C)(TM) methodology allowed a detailed insight into the course of treatment-related adverse events over the study period. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Dokument bearbeiten Dokument bearbeiten