Logo Logo
Hilfe
Hilfe
Switch Language to English

Hartrampf, Bonnie; Jochheim, David; Steffen, Julius; Czermak, Thomas; Sadoni, Sebastian; Lemmermoehle, Erik; Klier, Ina; Estner, Heidi L.; Massberg, Steffen; Mehilli, Julinda; Lackermair, Korbinian und Fichtner, Stephanie (2021): Permanent pacemaker dependency in patients with new left bundle branch block and new first degree atrioventricular block after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. In: Scientific Reports, Bd. 11, Nr. 1, 24383

Volltext auf 'Open Access LMU' nicht verfügbar.

Abstract

Conduction disorders with need for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation remain frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Up to 22% of PPM after TAVI are implanted for new onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and atrioventricular block (AVB) I. However, clinical benefit and predictors of ventricular pacing in TAVI patients receiving PPM for this indication remain unclear. We retrospectively evaluated pacemaker interrogation data of patients who received a PPM post TAVI for new LBBB and new AVB I. The primary endpoint of this study was relevant ventricular pacing (ventricular pacing rate: Vp >= 1%) at the first outpatient pacemaker interrogation. Secondary endpoints were predictors for relevant ventricular pacing. At the first pacemaker interrogation (median follow up at 6.23 [2.8-14.8] months), median ventricular pacing frequency was 1.0% [0.1-17.8]. Out of 61 patients, 36 (59%) had Vp rates >= 1%. Patients with frequent ventricular pacing showed longer QRS duration (155 ms +/- 17 ms vs. 144 ms +/- 18 ms, p = 0.018) at the time of PPM implantation and were less likely treated with a balloon-expandable Edwards Sapiens Valve (39% vs. 12%, p = 0.040). Our findings suggest that the majority of patients with new LBBB and new AVB I after TAVI show relevant ventricular pacing rates at follow up. Further prospective studies are necessary to identify patients at higher risk of pacemaker dependency.

Dokument bearbeiten Dokument bearbeiten