![[höher]](/style/images/multi_up.png)
Eine Ebene höherGruppiert nach:
Dokumententyp
| Veröffentlichungsdatum
Springe zu: Zeitschriftenartikel
Anzahl der Publikationen: 16
Zeitschriftenartikel
Leibel, Christian 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6893-4901 und Bornmann, Lutz ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0810-7091
(12. November 2024):
Specification uncertainty: What the disruption index tells us about the (hidden) multiverse of bibliometric indicators.
In: Scientometrics [Forthcoming]
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6893-4901 und Bornmann, Lutz ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0810-7091
(12. November 2024):
Specification uncertainty: What the disruption index tells us about the (hidden) multiverse of bibliometric indicators.
In: Scientometrics [Forthcoming]
Bornmann, Lutz ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0810-7091; Ettl, Christoph und Leibel, Christian ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6893-4901
(12. Juni 2024):
In search of innovative potential: The challenge of measuring disruptiveness of research using bibliometric data.
In: EMBO Reports, Bd. 25, Nr. 7: S. 2837-2841
[PDF, 495kB]
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0810-7091; Ettl, Christoph und Leibel, Christian ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6893-4901
(12. Juni 2024):
In search of innovative potential: The challenge of measuring disruptiveness of research using bibliometric data.
In: EMBO Reports, Bd. 25, Nr. 7: S. 2837-2841
[PDF, 495kB]
Leibel, Christian ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6893-4901 und Bornmann, Lutz ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0810-7091
(2024):
What do we know about the disruption index in scientometrics? An overview of the literature.
In: Scientometrics, Bd. 129: S. 601-639
[PDF, 2MB]
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6893-4901 und Bornmann, Lutz ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0810-7091
(2024):
What do we know about the disruption index in scientometrics? An overview of the literature.
In: Scientometrics, Bd. 129: S. 601-639
[PDF, 2MB]
Gruber, Anton ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7843-1108; Tekles, Alexander und Bornmann, Lutz
(2023):
John Mearsheimer’s academic roots: a reference publication year spectroscopy of a political scientist’s oeuvre.
In: Scientometrics, Bd. 128, Nr. 7: S. 3867-3877
[PDF, 738kB]
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7843-1108; Tekles, Alexander und Bornmann, Lutz
(2023):
John Mearsheimer’s academic roots: a reference publication year spectroscopy of a political scientist’s oeuvre.
In: Scientometrics, Bd. 128, Nr. 7: S. 3867-3877
[PDF, 738kB]
Tekles, Alexander ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8765-9331; Auspurg, Katrin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-0391 und Bornmann, Lutz
(2022):
Same-gender citations do not indicate a substantial gender homophily bias.
In: PLOS ONE 17(9), e0274810 [PDF, 1MB]
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8765-9331; Auspurg, Katrin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4504-0391 und Bornmann, Lutz
(2022):
Same-gender citations do not indicate a substantial gender homophily bias.
In: PLOS ONE 17(9), e0274810 [PDF, 1MB]
Bornmann, Lutz; Ganser, Christian und Tekles, Alexander
(2022):
Simulation of the h index use at university departments within the bibliometrics-based heuristics framework: Can the indicator be used to compare individual researchers?
In: Journal of Informetrics, Bd. 16, Nr. 1, 101237
Bittmann, Felix; Tekles, Alexander und Bornmann, Lutz
(2022):
Applied usage and performance of statistical matching in bibliometrics: The comparison of milestone and regular papers with multiple measurements of disruptiveness as an empirical example.
In: Quantitative Science Studies, Bd. 2, Nr. 4: S. 1246-1270
Bornmann, Lutz; Haunschild, Robin und Tekles, Alexander
(2022):
Are there biases in decisions to tweet on scientific papers? A plea for conducting an experimental Twitter study. Technical note.
In: Profesional De La Informacion, Bd. 31, Nr. 1, e310115
Wohlrabe, Klaus und Bornmann, Lutz
(2022):
Alphabetized co-authorship in economics reconsidered.
In: Scientometrics, Bd. 127, Nr. 5: S. 2173-2193
Bornmann, Lutz; Ganser, Christian und Tekles, Alexander
(2021):
Anchoring effects in the assessment of papers: The proposal for an empirical survey of citing authors.
In: PLOS One 16(9), e0257307
In: PLOS One 16(9), e0257307
Bornmann, Lutz und Tekles, Alexander
(2021):
Convergent validity of several indicators measuring disruptiveness with milestone assignments to physics papers by experts.
In: Journal of Informetrics, Bd. 15, Nr. 3, 101159
Bornmann, Lutz; Tekles, Alexander; Zhang, Helena H. und Ye, Fred Y.
(2019):
Do we measure novelty when we analyze unusual combinations of cited references? A validation study of bibliometric novelty indicators based on F1000Prime data.
In: Journal of Informetrics, Bd. 13, Nr. 4, UNSP 100979
Bornmann, Lutz; Tekles, Alexander und Leydesdorff, Loet
(2019):
The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) bibliometric indicators: How well does I3 perform for impact measurement?
In: 17Th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (Issi2019), Vol I: S. 112-124
Tekles, Alexander und Bornmann, Lutz
(2019):
Author name disambiguation of bibliometric data: A comparison of several unsupervised approaches.
In: 17Th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (Issi2019), Vol Ii: S. 1548-1559
Bornmann, Lutz und Tekles, Alexander
(2019):
Disruption index depends on length of citation window.
In: Profesional De La Informacion, Bd. 28, Nr. 2, UNSP e280207
Bornmann, Lutz; Tekles, Alexander und Leydesdorff, Loet
(2019):
How well does I3 perform for impact measurement compared to other bibliometric indicators? The convergent validity of several (field-normalized) indicators.
In: Scientometrics, Bd. 119, Nr. 2: S. 1187-1205