|
Eine Ebene nach oben |
Gruppiert nach:
Dokumententyp
| Veröffentlichungsdatum
Springe zu: Zeitschriftenartikel
Anzahl der Publikationen: 5
Zeitschriftenartikel
Denissen, Jaap J. A. 
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6282-4107 und Rauthmann, John F.
(2024):
A comprehensive scan of psychological disciplines through self-identification on Google Scholar: Relative endorsement, topical coverage, and publication patterns.
In: PLOS ONE 19(1), e0296421 [PDF, 1MB]
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6282-4107 und Rauthmann, John F.
(2024):
A comprehensive scan of psychological disciplines through self-identification on Google Scholar: Relative endorsement, topical coverage, and publication patterns.
In: PLOS ONE 19(1), e0296421 [PDF, 1MB]
Humberg, Sarah; Dufner, Michael; Schönbrodt, Felix D.; Geukes, Katharina; Hutteman, Roos; Zalk, Maarten H. W. van; Denissen, Jaap J. A.; Nestler, Steffen und Back, Mitja D.
(2022):
The True Role That Suppressor Effects Play in Condition-Based Regression Analysis: None. A Reply to Fiedler (2021).
In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Bd. 123, Nr. 4: S. 884-888
Humberg, Sarah; Dufner, Michael; Schönbrodt, Felix D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-3910; Geukes, Katharina; Hutteman, Roos; Kuefner, Albrecht C. P.; van Zalk, Maarten H. W.; Denissen, Jaap J. A.; Nestler, Steffen und Back, Mitja D.
(2019):
Is Accurate, Positive, or Inflated Self-Perception Most Advantageous for Psychological Adjustment? A Competitive Test of Key Hypotheses.
In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Bd. 116, Nr. 5: S. 835-859
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-3910; Geukes, Katharina; Hutteman, Roos; Kuefner, Albrecht C. P.; van Zalk, Maarten H. W.; Denissen, Jaap J. A.; Nestler, Steffen und Back, Mitja D.
(2019):
Is Accurate, Positive, or Inflated Self-Perception Most Advantageous for Psychological Adjustment? A Competitive Test of Key Hypotheses.
In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Bd. 116, Nr. 5: S. 835-859
Humberg, Sarah; Dufner, Michael; Schönbrodt, Felix D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-3910; Geukes, Katharina; Hutteman, Roos; Zalk, Maarten H. W. van; Denissen, Jaap J. A.; Nestler, Steffen und Back, Mitja D.
(2018):
Enhanced Versus Simply Positive: A New Condition-Based Regression Analysis to Disentangle Effects of Self-Enhancement From Effects of Positivity of Self-View.
In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Bd. 114, Nr. 2: S. 303-322
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-3910; Geukes, Katharina; Hutteman, Roos; Zalk, Maarten H. W. van; Denissen, Jaap J. A.; Nestler, Steffen und Back, Mitja D.
(2018):
Enhanced Versus Simply Positive: A New Condition-Based Regression Analysis to Disentangle Effects of Self-Enhancement From Effects of Positivity of Self-View.
In: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Bd. 114, Nr. 2: S. 303-322
Humberg, Sarah; Hufner, Michael; Schönbrodt, Felix D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-3910; Geukes, Katharina; Hutteman, Roos; van Zalk, Maarten H. W.; Denissen, Jaap J. A.; Nestler, Steffen und Back, Mitja D.
(2018):
Why Condition-Based Regression Analysis (CRA) is Indeed a Valid Test of Self-Enhancement Effects. A Response to Krueger et al. (2017).
In: Collabra: Psychology, Bd. 4, Nr. 1, 26
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8282-3910; Geukes, Katharina; Hutteman, Roos; van Zalk, Maarten H. W.; Denissen, Jaap J. A.; Nestler, Steffen und Back, Mitja D.
(2018):
Why Condition-Based Regression Analysis (CRA) is Indeed a Valid Test of Self-Enhancement Effects. A Response to Krueger et al. (2017).
In: Collabra: Psychology, Bd. 4, Nr. 1, 26