Home  |  Browse  |  Authors  |  Advanced Search  |  Help
Login | Create Account
Bauer, Christian and Lingens, Jörg (04. May 2009): Smoking Bans in the Presence of Social Interaction. Discussion Papers in Economics 2009-7

Metadaten exportieren

Autor(en) recherchieren

Lesezeichen anlegen

[img]
Preview
PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Reader
130Kb

Abstract

This paper analyzes the welfare effects of a public smoking ban in bars. We construct a model that captures crucial features of bar life: competing bars, social interaction, and heterogenous preferences for a smoking ban. Smokers and non-smokers simultaneously choose a bar given their preferences for meeting other people. Bars anticipate the behavior of individuals and choose the smoking regime strategically. Since the (dis)utility from smoking and social interaction are substitutes, the smoking regime is a stronger coordination device if the disutility from smoking is large. If all bars allow smoking in equilibrium, a public smoking ban enhances welfare.

Item Type:Paper (Discussion Paper)
Keywords:Smoking Ban, Social Interaction, Coordination Game
Subjects:Economics
Economics > Discussion Papers in Economics
Dewey Classification:300 Social sciences
300 Social sciences > 330 Economics
Journal of Economic Literature classification:L13, I18, D61
URN:urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-10593-1
Language:English
ID Code:10593
Deposited On:05. May 2009 15:17
Last Modified:12. Jan 2012 16:56
References:

[1] A. Banerjee. A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3):797–817, 1992. [2] C. Bauer and J. Lingens. The strategic effects of smoking bans. BGPE Discussion Paper Nr. 55, 2008. [3] D. Bikchandani, S.; Hirshleifer and I. Welch. A theory of fads, fashion and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100:992–1026, 1992. [4] W. Boyes and M. Marlow. The public demand for smoking bans. Public Choice, 88(1):57–67, 1996. [5] A. Dixit and M. Olson. Does voluntary participation undermine the Coase Theorem? Journal of Public Economics, 76(3):309–335, 2000. [6] J. Dunham and M. Marlow. Smoking laws and their differential effects on restaurants, bars, and taverns. Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(3):326–333, 2000. [7] J. Dunham and M. Marlow. The economic incidence of smoking laws. Applied Economics, 35(18):1935–1942, 2003. [8] J. Dunham and M. Marlow. The Private Market for Accommodation: Determinants of Smoking Policies in Restaurants and Bars. Eastern Economic Journal, 30(3):377–392, 2004. [9] D. Lee. Government v. Coase: The case of smoking. Cato Institute¡ Washington, DC¿: The Cato journal, 11(1):151–164, 1991. [10] C. Phelps. Health economics. Harper Collins, 1992. [11] P. Poutvaara and L.-H. Siemers. Smoking and social interaction. Journal of Health Economics, forthcomming 2009. [12] R. Tollison and R. Wagner. The Economics of Smoking. Kluwer Academic Pub, 1992.

Open Access LMU is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software creditsAbout