Abstract
How do scientists generate knowledge in groups, and how have they done so in the past? How do epistemically motivated social interactions influence or even drive this process? These questions speak to core interests of both history and philosophy of science. Idealised models and formal arguments have been suggested to illuminate the social epistemology of science, but their conclusions are not directly applicable to scientific practice. This paper uses one of these models as a lens and historiographical tool in the examination of actual scientific collectives. It centres on the analysis of two episodes from the history of photosynthesis research of the late nineteenth- to mid-twentieth centuries, which display a wide and coordinated intellectual diversity similar to Kitcher's division of cognitive labour (1990). The concept, I argue, captures important aspects of the photosynthesis research communities, but the underlying process unfolded in ways that differ from the model's assumption in interesting ways. The paper unravels how the self-organised interplay of cooperation and competition, and the dynamics of individual and collective goals within scientific communities were influential factors in the generation of knowledge. From there, some thoughts are developed on how historical and philosophical approaches in the analysis of science can productively interact.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Fakultät: | Geschichts- und Kunstwissenschaften > Historisches Seminar |
Themengebiete: | 900 Geschichte und Geografie > 900 Geschichte |
ISSN: | 0925-4560 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 100822 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 05. Jun. 2023, 15:35 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Apr. 2024, 10:10 |