Abstract
Why do employees experience work from home (WFH) differently? We draw on boundary theory to explain how WFH influences employees’ work–home interface. WFH intensity increases negative spillovers (i.e., work-to-home conflict and home-to-work conflict) and positive spillovers (i.e., work-to-home enrichment and home-to-work enrichment) between the work and home domains. Negative spillovers can be mitigated through high-quality work equipment and beneficial spatial conditions at home. Domain centrality predicts who can benefit from increased WFH intensity. We test our theory with a sample of 545 employees, obtained through a two-step random sampling procedure in the city of Munich/Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic. We find that WFH intensity increases work-to-home conflict and home-to-work enrichment, affecting employees’ relationship satisfaction and job satisfaction. High-quality work equipment mitigates the detrimental effects of WFH. Employees with a high family centrality can reap benefits of more WFH because they experience more home-to-work enrichment. The simultaneous desirable and detrimental effects of WFH intensity can partly explain why studies have found heterogenous WFH experiences among employees.
Dokumententyp: | Zeitschriftenartikel |
---|---|
Keywords: | Work–home interface; job satisfaction; relationship satisfaction; work from home; technology |
Fakultät: | Betriebswirtschaft > Institute for Human Capital Management |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-105898-1 |
ISSN: | 1664-1078 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 105898 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 18. Aug. 2023, 17:18 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 27. Okt. 2023, 15:44 |