Abstract
This paper analyzes the welfare effects of a public smoking ban in bars. We construct a model that captures crucial features of bar life: competing bars, social interaction, and heterogenous preferences for a smoking ban. Smokers and non-smokers simultaneously choose a bar given their preferences for meeting other people. Bars anticipate the behavior of individuals and choose the smoking regime strategically. Since the (dis)utility from smoking and social interaction are substitutes, the smoking regime is a stronger coordination device if the disutility from smoking is large. If all bars allow smoking in equilibrium, a public smoking ban enhances welfare.
Dokumententyp: | Paper |
---|---|
Keywords: | Smoking Ban, Social Interaction, Coordination Game |
Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft
Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 300 Sozialwissenschaft, Soziologie
300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
JEL Classification: | L13, I18, D61 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-10593-1 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 10593 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 05. Mai 2009, 13:17 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 08. Nov. 2020, 11:13 |
Literaturliste: | [1] A. Banerjee. A simple model of herd behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3):797–817, 1992. [2] C. Bauer and J. Lingens. The strategic effects of smoking bans. BGPE Discussion Paper Nr. 55, 2008. [3] D. Bikchandani, S.; Hirshleifer and I. Welch. A theory of fads, fashion and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100:992–1026, 1992. [4] W. Boyes and M. Marlow. The public demand for smoking bans. Public Choice, 88(1):57–67, 1996. [5] A. Dixit and M. Olson. Does voluntary participation undermine the Coase Theorem? Journal of Public Economics, 76(3):309–335, 2000. [6] J. Dunham and M. Marlow. Smoking laws and their differential effects on restaurants, bars, and taverns. Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(3):326–333, 2000. [7] J. Dunham and M. Marlow. The economic incidence of smoking laws. Applied Economics, 35(18):1935–1942, 2003. [8] J. Dunham and M. Marlow. The Private Market for Accommodation: Determinants of Smoking Policies in Restaurants and Bars. Eastern Economic Journal, 30(3):377–392, 2004. [9] D. Lee. Government v. Coase: The case of smoking. Cato Institute¡ Washington, DC: The Cato journal, 11(1):151–164, 1991. [10] C. Phelps. Health economics. Harper Collins, 1992. [11] P. Poutvaara and L.-H. Siemers. Smoking and social interaction. Journal of Health Economics, forthcomming 2009. [12] R. Tollison and R. Wagner. The Economics of Smoking. Kluwer Academic Pub, 1992. |