Abstract
In this paper, we analyze the equilibrium amount of entertainment in news coverage of newspapers and television stations. We find that a shift in the inclination to read, expressed by a shift in the (psychological) distance costs, induces both media outlets to incorporate more entertaining elements in news coverage. The introduction of commercial television, however, which leads to a unilateral fall in the distance costs to the television broadcast, yields different results. It induces a negative effect on the profits of both media outlets, and increases price competition. Furthermore, the newspaper offers less while the television channel offers more entertainment. Overall, this leads to a marginalization of informational content, as the television channel gains market shares at the expense of the newspaper.
Dokumententyp: | Paper |
---|---|
Keywords: | media economics, industrial organization, media bias, horizontal product differentiation, duopoly |
Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft
Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 300 Sozialwissenschaft, Soziologie
300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
JEL Classification: | D72, L13, L82 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-11551-9 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 11551 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 23. Jun. 2010, 08:01 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020, 14:31 |
Literaturliste: | [1] Ahrens, F. (2009): The accelerating decline of newspapers. The Washington Post, October 27, 2009. available through www.washingtonpost.com [2] Alger, D. (1998): Megamedia: How giant corporations dominate mass media, distort competition, and endanger democracy. New York: Roman & Littlefield [3] Anderson, S.P., A. de Palma, and Y. Nesterov (1995): Oligopolistic competition and the optimal provision of products. Econometrica 63, 1281-1301 [4] Anderson, S.P., J.K. Goeree, and R. Ramer (1997): Location, location, location, Journal of Economic Theory 77, 102-127 [5] Baumeister, R., E. Bratslavsky, C. Finkenauer, and K. Vohs (2001): Bad is Stronger than Good. Review of General Psychology 5(4), 323-370 [6] Berg, K., and C.-M. Ridder (2002): Massenkommunikation VI. Eine Langzeitstudie zur Mediennutzung und Medienbewertung 1964-2000. Nomos [7] Besley, T. and R. Burgess (2002): The Political Economcy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics 117, 4, 1415-1452 [8] Besley, T. and A. Prat (2006): Handcuffs for the Grabbing Hand? Media Capture and Government Accountability. American Economic Review 96, 720-736 [9] Blair, R. D. and R. E. Romano (1993): Pricing Decisions of the Newspaper Monopolist. Southern Economic Journal 59, 721-732 [10] Brosius, H.-B. (1998): Informationsrezeption - gestern, heute morgen. In: Klingler, W. et al.: Medienrezeption seit 1945. Forschungsbilanz und Forschungsperspektiven. 223-235 [11] Bucklin, R., R. Caves and A. W. Lo (1989): Games of Survival in the Newspaper Industry. Applied Economics 21, 631–650 [12] Corneo, G. (2006): Media Capture in a Democracy: The Role of Wealth Concentration, Journal of Public Economics 90, 37-58 [13] D’Aspremont, C., J. J. Gabszewicz; and J.-F. Thisse (1979): On Hotelling’s "Stability in Competition". Econometrica, 1145-1150 [14] DellaVigna, S. and E. Kaplan (2007): The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting, with Ethan Kaplan, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1187-1234 [15] Djankov, S., C. McLeish, T. Nenova, and A. Shleifer (2003): Who Owns the Media?, Journal of Law & Economics, 341-81 [16] Economides, N. (1993): Hotelling’s „Main Street“ with More than Two Competitors. Journal of Regional Science 33, 303 - 319. [17] Gentzkow, M. and J. M. Shapiro (2006): Media Bias and Reputation. Journal of Political Economy 114(2), 280-316 [18] George, L. M. and Waldfogel, J. (2006): The New York Times and the Market for Local Newspapers. American Economic Review 96, 435–447 [19] Graber, D. (1984): Processing the News. White Plains, NY: Longman. [20] Hotelling, H. (1929): Stability in Competition. The Economic Journal, 41-57. [21] Krueger, U.M., and T. Zapf-Schramm (2001): Die Boulevardisierungskluft im Deutschen Fernsehen. Media Perspektiven, 326-344 [22] McCombs, M.E., and D.L. Shaw. (1972) The Agenda-Setting Function of Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 176-187 [23] Mussa, M., and S. Rosen (1986): Monopoly and product quality. Journal of Economic Theory 18, 301-317 [24] Mullainathan, S. and A. Shleifer (2005): The Market for News. American Economic Review 95, 1031-1053 [25] Nilssen, T. (1997): Sequential location when transportation costs are asymmetric. Economic Letters 54, 191-201 [26] Östgaard, E. (1965): Factors Influencing the Flow of News. In: Journal of Peace Research 2, 39-63 [27] Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (2004): News audiences increasingly politicized: Online news audiences larger, more diverse. available through http://www.pewresearch.org [28] Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (2009): State of the News Media 2009 An Annual Report on American Journalism. available through http://www.pewresearch.org [29] Schneller J. (2008): Mediennutzung gestern - heute - morgen. available through www.awa-online.de [30] Strömberg, D. (2001): Mass Media and Public Policy. European Economic Review 45, 652-663 [31] Tabuchi, T., and J.-F. Thisse (1995): Asymmetric equilibria in spatial competition. Internationals Journal of Industrial Organization 13, 213-227 [32] Veronis, Suhler, Stevenson (2003): Communications Industry Forecast 2002. available through www.vss.com |