Tempus Fugit: Time Pressure in Risky Decisions

Kocher, Martin G.; Pahlke, Julius and Trautmann, Stefan T. (April 2011): Tempus Fugit: Time Pressure in Risky Decisions. Discussion Papers in Economics 2011-8

Abstract

We study the effects of time pressure on risky decisions for pure gain prospects, pure loss prospects, and mixed prospects involving both gains and losses. In an experiment we find that risk aversion for gains is robust under time pressure whereas risk seeking for losses turns into risk aversion under time pressure. For mixed prospects, subjects become more loss averse and more gain seeking under time pressure, depending on the framing of the prospects. The results suggest the importance of aspiration levels under time pressure. We discuss the implications of our findings for decision making situations that involve time pressure.

• Item Type: Paper
• Keywords: time pressure, risky decisions, risk aversion, loss aversion, gain seeking, aspiration level
• Faculties: Economics; Economics > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics; Economics > Chairs > Chair of Empirical Economics
• Subjects: 300 Social sciences > 300 Social sciences, sociology and anthropology; 300 Social sciences > 330 Economics
• JEL Classification: C91, D81
• Language: English

References

Barsky, Robert B., F. Thomas Juster, Miles S. Kimball and Matthew D. Shapiro (1997). Preference Parameters and Behavioral Heterogeneity: An Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Study. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 537–579.

Ben Zur, Hasida and Shlomo J. Breznitz (1980). The Effect of Time Pressure on Risky Choice Behavior. Acta Psychologica 47, 89–104.

Bollard, Albert, Robert Lui, Anjali D. Nursimulu, Antonio Rangel and Peter Bossaerts (2007). Neurophysiological Evidence on Perception of Reward and Risk: Implications for Trading Under Time Pressure. Working Paper, CalTech.

Booij, Adam S. and Gijs van de Kuilen (2009). A Parameter-Free Analysis of the Utility of Money for the General Population under Prospect Theory. Journal of Economic Psychology 30, 651–666.

Borghans, Lex, Bart H. H. Goldsteyn, James J. Heckman, and Hub Meijers (2009). Gender Differences in Risk and Ambiguity Aversion. Journal of the European Economic Association 7, 649–658.

Busse, Jeffrey A. and T. Clifton Green (2002). Market Efficiency in Real Time. Journal of Financial Economics, 65, 415–437.

Camerer, Colin F. and Robin M. Hogarth (1999). The Effect of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19, 7−42.

Camerer, Colin F., George Loewenstein and Drazen Prelec (2005). Neuroeconomics: How Neuroscience Can Inform Economics. Journal of Economic Literature 43, 9−64.

Croson, Rachel T. A. and Uri Gneezy (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of Economic Literature 47, 448–74.

Diecidue, Enrico and Jeroen van de Ven (2008). Aspiration Level, Probability of Success and Failure, and Expected Utility. International Economic Review 49, 683–700.

Dohmen, Thomas, Armin Falk, David Huffman, Uwe Sunde, Jürgen Schupp, and Gert G. Wagner (2011). Individual Risk Attitudes: Measurement, Determinants and Behavioral Consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, forthcoming.

Engelmann, Jan B., C. Monica Capra, Charles N. Noussair and Gregory S. Berns (2009). Expert Financial Advice Neurobiologically “Offloads” Financial Decision-Making under Risk. PLoS one 4, e4957.

Fehr-Duda, Helga, Manuele De Gennaro, and Renate Schubert (2006). Gender, Financial Risk, and Probability Weighting. Theory and Decision 60, 283−313.

Fischbacher, Urs (2007). Z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economics experiments. Experimental Economics 10, 171–178.

Glimcher, Paul W. (2004). Decisions, Uncertainty, and the Brain: The Science of Neuroeconomics. MIT Press: Cambridge/Mass.

Guiso, Luigi and Monica Paiella (2008). Risk Aversion, Wealth, and Background Risk. Journal of the European Economic Association 6, 1109–1150.

Harrison, Glenn W., Morten I. Lau and Melonie B. Williams (2002). Estimating Individual Discount Rates in Denmark: A Field Experiment. American Economic Review 92, 1606–1617.

Hey, John D. and Jinkwon Lee (2005). Do Subjects Separate (or Are They Sophisticated)? Experimental Economics 8, 233–265.

Hilton, Denis J. (2003). Psychology and the Financial Markets: Applications to Understanding and Remedying Irrational Decision-Making. In Brocas, Isabelle and Juan D. Carrillo (eds.). The Psychology of Economic Decisions (Vol. I): Rationality and Well-Being. Oxford University Press: New York, 273–297.

Holt, Charles A. and Susan K. Laury (2002). Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects. American Economic Review 92, 1644–1655.

Ibanez, Marcela, Simon Czermak and Matthias Sutter (2009). Searching for a Better Deal. On the Influence of Group Decision Making, Time Pressure and Gender in a Search Experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology 30, 1–10.

Issac, R. Mark and Duncan James (2000). Just What Are You Calling Risk Averse? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 20, 177−187.

James, Duncan (2007). Stability of Risk Preference Parameter Estimates within the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Procedure. Experimental Economics 10, 123−141.

Kocher, Martin G. and Matthias Sutter (2006). Time is Money – Time Pressure, Incentives, and the Quality of Decision-Making. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 61, 375–392.

Maule, John A., G. Robert J. Hockey and Larissa Bdzola (2000). Effects of Time-Pressure on Decision Making Under Uncertainty: Changes in Affective State and Information Processing Strategy. Acta Psychologica 104, 283−301.

Myagkov, Mikhail and Charles R. Plott (1997). Exchange Economies and Loss Exposure: Experiments Exploring Prospect Theory and Competitive Equilibria in Market Environments. American Economic Review 87, 801–828.

Moffatt, Peter G. (2005). Stochastic Choice and the Allocation of Cognitive Effort. Experimental Economics 8, 369−388.

Payne, John W. (2005). It is Whether You Win or Lose: The Importance of the Overall Probabilities of Winning or Losing in Risky Choice. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 30, 5−19.

Payne, John W., James R. Bettman and Eric J. Johnson (1993). The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK.

Payne, John W., James R. Bettman and May Frances Luce (1996). When Time is Money: Decision Behavior under Opportunity-Cost Time Pressure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 66, 131-152.

Reutskaja, Elena, Rosemarie Nagel, Colin F. Camerer and Antonio Rangel (2011). Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking Study. American Economic Review 101, 900–926.

Roth, Alvin E., L. Keith Murnighan and Francoise Schoumaker (1988). The Deadline Effect in Bargaining: Some Experimental Evidence. American Economic Review 78, 806−823.

Roth, Alvin E. and Axel Ockenfels (2002). Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon Auctions on the Internet. American Economic Review 92, 1138−1151.

Schmidt, Ulrich and Tibor Neugebauer (2007). Testing Expected Utility in the Presence of Errors. Economic Journal 117, 470−485.

Schubert, Renate, Martin Brown, Matthias Gysler and Hans Wolfgang Brachinger (1999). Financial Decision-Making: Are Women Really More Risk-Averse. American Economic Review 89, 381–385.

Slovic, Paul (1972). Psychological Study of Human Judgment: Implications for Investment Decision Making. Journal of Finance 27, 779–799.

Starmer, Chris and Robert Sugden (1991). Does the Random-Lottery Incentive System Elicit True Preferences? An Experimental Investigation. American Economic Review 81, 971–978.

Sutter, Matthias, Martin G. Kocher and Sabine Strauß (2003). Bargaining under Time Pressure in an Experimental Ultimatum Game. Economics Letters 81, 341−347.

Tom, Sabrina M., Craig R. Fox, Christopher Trepel and Russell A. Poldrack (2007). The Neural Basis of Loss Aversion in Decision-Making under Risk. Science 315, 515–518.

Wakker, Peter P., Veronika Köbberling and Christiane Schwieren (2007a). Prospect-Theory’s Diminishing Sensitivity versus Economics’ Intrinsic Utility of Money: How the Introduction of the Euro Can be Used to Disentangle the Two Empirically. Theory and Decision 63, 205−231.

Wakker, Peter P., Danielle R. M. Timmermans and Irma Machielse (2007b). The Effects of Statistical Information on Risk Attitudes and Rational Insurance Decisions. Management Science 53, 1770–1784.

Wilcox, Nathaniel T. (1993). Lottery Choice: Incentives, Complexity and Decision Time. Economic Journal 103, 1397−1417.