Abstract
Is there a conflict between the claim that the state ought not to promote any values and the idea that it ought to encourage autonomy? Colburn (2010) denies such a conflict. In this paper, I will argue that Colburn’s considerations fail to dissolve the dissent between political liberalism and an autonomy-minded perfectionism. In order to show this, I will focus on the question of whether or not the state may be committed to the value of autonomy in the educational system.
Dokumententyp: | Konferenzbeitrag (Vortrag) |
---|---|
Keywords: | liberalism, perfectionism, autonomy |
Fakultät: | Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft > XXII. Deutscher Kongress für Philosophie
Philosophie, Wissenschaftstheorie und Religionswissenschaft > XXII. Deutscher Kongress für Philosophie > Politische Philosophie |
Themengebiete: | 100 Philosophie und Psychologie > 170 Ethik |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-12361-9 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 12361 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 20. Okt. 2011, 10:10 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020, 12:52 |
Literaturliste: | Colburn, B. 2010. Anti-Perfectionisms and autonomy. Analysis 70: 247-56. Galston, W. 1995. Two Concepts of Liberalism. Ethics 105: 516–34. Hurka, T. 1993. Perfectionism. New York: Oxford University Press. Macedo, S. 1995. Liberal Civic Education and Religious Fundamentalism: The Case of God v. John Rawls? Ethics 105: 468-496. Rawls, J. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press. Raz, J. 1986. The Morality of Freedom. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Wall, S. 1998. Liberalism, Perfectionism and Restraint. New York: Cambridge University Press. |