Logo Logo
Hilfe
Hilfe
Switch Language to English

Gerb, Johannes ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5053-1462; Kirsch, Valerie ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9397-436X; Kierig, Emilie ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5443-4806; Brandt, Thomas ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0454-2371; Dieterich, Marianne ORCID logoORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9903-9594 und Boegle, Rainer (2025): Optimizing spatial normalization of multisubject inner ear MRI: comparison of different geometry-preserving co-registration approaches. In: Scientific Reports, Bd. 15, 6414 [PDF, 1MB]

Abstract

Spatial normalization of multisubject inner ear imaging data is challenging, due to both substantial intraindividual differences and the small size of the organ compared to other intracranial structures. Automatic whole brain co-registration to standard space can only roughly co-align the peripheral vestibular endorgan, and complemental manual registration is highly time-consuming. Here, we compared the accuracy of four geometry-maintaining co-registration methods (one semi-manual method and three automatic methods). High-resolution structural T2-MRI of 153 inner ears from patients and healthy participants were co-registered to an inner-ear atlas. The semi-manual method used a three-point landmark-based approach (3P), two automatic methods were based on unassisted standard algorithms (Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs), Elastix (EL)), while the fourth automatic method utilized a volumetrically dilated, atlas-based mask (thick inner ear, TIE) for probabilistic inner ear masking. Registration accuracy was evaluated by neurotologists blinded to the respective registration paradigm, and the resulting median volumes were quantified using colocalization analyses. The mask-aided automatic approach showed the best ratings, followed by the semi-manual three-point landmark-based registration (mean ratings (lower: better) TIE 2.21 ± 1.15; 3P 2.58 ± 0.61; EL 3.42 ± 1.06; ANTs 3.49 ± 1.26). The semi-manual method had the lowest rate of insufficient registrations, followed by TIE (3P: 3.70%; TIE: 8.28%; EL: 22.66%; ANTs: 27.02%). TIE showed the highest colocalization metrics with the atlas. Only TIE and 3P allowed for sufficient semicircular canal visualization in method-wise average volumes. Overall, geometry-preserving spatial normalization of multisubject inner ear imaging data is possible and could allow groupwise examinations of the bony labyrinth or temporal bone morphology in the future.

Dokument bearbeiten Dokument bearbeiten