Dies ist die neueste Version des Dokumentes.
Abstract
We show that concerns for fairness may have dramatic consequences for the optimal provision of incentives in a moral hazard context. Incentive contracts that are optimal when there are only selfish actors become inferior when some agents are concerned about fairness. Conversely, contracts that are doomed to fail when there are only selfish actors provide powerful incentives and become superior when there are also fair-minded players. These predictions are strongly supported by the results of a series of experiments. Furthermore, our results suggest that the existence of fair actors may be an important reason why many contracts are left deliberately incomplete.
Dokumententyp: | Paper |
---|---|
Keywords: | Incentive Contracts ; Moral Hazard ; Fairness ; Reciprocity ; Incomplete Contracts |
Fakultät: | Volkswirtschaft
Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics > Mikroökonomik Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics > Verhaltenswissenschaftliche Ökonomik Volkswirtschaft > Munich Discussion Papers in Economics > Institutionenökonomik Volkswirtschaft > Lehrstühle > Seminar für Wirtschaftstheorie |
Themengebiete: | 300 Sozialwissenschaften > 300 Sozialwissenschaft, Soziologie
300 Sozialwissenschaften > 330 Wirtschaft |
JEL Classification: | C7, C9, J3 |
URN: | urn:nbn:de:bvb:19-epub-18-6 |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Dokumenten ID: | 18 |
Datum der Veröffentlichung auf Open Access LMU: | 13. Apr. 2005 |
Letzte Änderungen: | 04. Nov. 2020, 15:25 |
Alle Versionen dieses Dokumentes
-
Fairness, Incentives and Contractual Incompleteness. (deposited 15. Apr. 2014, 08:51)
- Fairness, Incentives and Contractual Incompleteness. (deposited 13. Apr. 2005) [momentan angezeigt]